Riesel base 6 - team drive #4 - EIGHT OR BUST! - Page 5

Dougal · 2009-08-25, 11:20

reserving 270-275 for another computer

Lennart · 2009-08-25, 13:39

Taking 275k-280k

265k-270k complete

Lennart

Dougal · 2009-08-25, 15:50

lennart,i didnt think you reserved 265-275, a typo?

nevermind,looking at your results,it looks to be a typo

Lennart · 2009-08-25, 16:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dougal

lennart,i didnt think you reserved 265-275, a typo?

nevermind,looking at your results,it looks to be a typo

Yes sorry. Wrong by me

shall be 265k-270k

========================================================

I have sieved 290k-1M to 17T now.

978 sec/factor on one core 2,4Ghz

Here it is.

Lennart

mdettweiler · 2009-08-25, 17:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lennart

Yes sorry. Wrong by me

shall be 265k-270k

========================================================

I have sieved 290k-1M to 17T now.

978 sec/factor on one core 2,4Ghz

Here it is.

Lennart

I've fixed the typo in your original post. Meanwhile, are you planning to continue with the sieve, or are you stopping at 17T? On my computer (C2D 2.2Ghz), tests at ~260K take about 990 seconds apiece. Thus, it would seem that we're still a ways away from optimal for anything >290K.

Lennart · 2009-08-25, 17:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdettweiler

I've fixed the typo in your original post. Meanwhile, are you planning to continue with the sieve, or are you stopping at 17T? On my computer (C2D 2.2Ghz), tests at ~260K take about 990 seconds apiece. Thus, it would seem that we're still a ways away from optimal for anything >290K.

Thank's.

Yes it is true that we have to sieve more.

I will countinue to sieve, i just thought we need more to LLR soon

Lennart

Flatlander · 2009-08-25, 17:53

195-200 is complete.

mdettweiler · 2009-08-25, 18:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lennart

Thank's.

Yes it is true that we have to sieve more.

I will countinue to sieve, i just thought we need more to LLR soon

Lennart

Ah, I see. Well, I was thinking that we should probably wait until the next chunk (290K-400K?) is optimally sieved before breaking off any more for LLRing. If we end up running out of files for a short time, there's always plenty of work over on the Sierpinski side. Of course, the final decision is up to Gary.

Flatlander · 2009-08-25, 18:13

Taking 280-285.

Mini-Geek · 2009-08-25, 18:38

Thought I should give an update on 170k-175k:
I bit off a bit more than I could chew between NPLB, CRUS, and factoring, so I paused this work (after crunching ~45 of the ~280 candidates) until I could finish the NPLB work (specifically, mini-drive 454K-456K; that work is currently getting all of my CPU). That should finish early tomorrow morning, then within another two days or so I'll finish 170k-175k.
Sorry for the delay. Hopefully it's not causing too much trouble. (would be quite a mixed bag if a prime is in 170-175, huh!

on the plus side, we'd be down to 7 k's, on the down side, that means I made other people waste work from doing needless tests on higher n's for the k) I'll be more careful in the future.

Lennart · 2009-08-25, 20:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdettweiler

Ah, I see. Well, I was thinking that we should probably wait until the next chunk (290K-400K?) is optimally sieved before breaking off any more for LLRing. If we end up running out of files for a short time, there's always plenty of work over on the Sierpinski side. Of course, the final decision is up to Gary.

I will have the file sieved to 32T tomorrow

275k-280k Complete.

Lennart

2009-08-25, 15:50	#47
Dougal Jan 2009 Ireland 2·3·31 Posts	lennart,i didnt think you reserved 265-275, a typo? nevermind,looking at your results,it looks to be a typo Last fiddled with by Dougal on 2009-08-25 at 15:51

2009-08-25, 18:38	#54
Mini-Geek Account Deleted "Tim Sorbera" Aug 2006 San Antonio, TX USA 17×251 Posts	Thought I should give an update on 170k-175k: I bit off a bit more than I could chew between NPLB, CRUS, and factoring, so I paused this work (after crunching ~45 of the ~280 candidates) until I could finish the NPLB work (specifically, mini-drive 454K-456K; that work is currently getting all of my CPU). That should finish early tomorrow morning, then within another two days or so I'll finish 170k-175k. Sorry for the delay. Hopefully it's not causing too much trouble. (would be quite a mixed bag if a prime is in 170-175, huh! on the plus side, we'd be down to 7 k's, on the down side, that means I made other people waste work from doing needless tests on higher n's for the k) I'll be more careful in the future. Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2009-08-25 at 18:39

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Riesel base 16 - team drive #2	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	213	2014-02-26 09:35
Sierp base 63 - team drive #5	rogue	Conjectures 'R Us	146	2011-04-20 05:12
Sieving drive Riesel base 6 n=1M-2M	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	40	2011-01-22 08:10
Sieving drive Riesel base 6 n=150K-1M	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	27	2009-10-08 21:49
Riesel base 3 - mini-drive I	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	199	2009-09-30 18:44

2009-08-25, 11:20	#45
Dougal Jan 2009 Ireland 2·3·31 Posts	reserving 270-275 for another computer

2009-08-25, 18:13	#53
Flatlander I quite division it "Chris" Feb 2005 England 31×67 Posts	Taking 280-285.