80M to 64 bits ... but not really reserved - Page 4

petrw1 · 2009-08-17, 04:28

Less than 10,000 left unassigned... (about 9,800).

petrw1 · 2009-08-19, 18:27

Looks like Sunfish has joined us in the 8028 and 8029 ranges.

9,145 left unassigned in the ranges:

80300000-80499999
80600000-80779999

Sunfish · 2009-08-21, 08:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by petrw1

Looks like Sunfish has joined us in the 8028 and 8029 ranges.

Yes, that's right. I also have a good old Athlon system that has been shifted to TF work quite some time ago (yes, there have been times where it was considered a high-speed system doing first-time LL tests...).

About 2 days ago I finished moving the last expos in the 200M range from 61 to 63 bit. Due to the fact that this system will be decommisioned within the next few days (the parts for my new Core i7 system are on the way already) it did not make much sense to start some new range.

So I thought that it might be a nice farewell for this system to join you in this range for a few more TFs before being shut down forever soon.

petrw1 · 2009-08-21, 13:34

Welcome aboard

garo · 2009-09-03, 11:28

I am taking 8065 to 8072. That leaves 8036 to 8050.

lfm · 2009-09-03, 15:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by petrw1

Yes, I wish I could replace all my low-end machines with Quads ... but there is the $$ issue. But since I can't right now, what do I do:

The quads are getting cheaper too. It prolly won't be long till you can pick up an old quad at a flee market real cheap from someone who has upgraded to an I7 or something.

markr · 2009-09-07, 14:23

Taking 8046 to 8050. 8036 to 8046 remains unassigned.

petrw1 · 2009-09-09, 15:03

Wow in the last month the number of exponents under 100M that are less than 64 bits have dropped from over 330K to under 150K.

At the rate factoring is progressing by year end there could be no exponents below 1B factored to less than 64 bits.

garo · 2009-09-09, 15:13

Thanks to chalsall!

chalsall · 2009-09-10, 16:48

Hey all.

I'm in the process of bringing the last ~5000 unreserved exponents in the 91M - 93M up to 64 bits. Should be finished Sunday.

I was planning to then start working down the 87M to 82M range, starting with 86M - 87M.

However, I don't like to step on anyone's toes, and I have what some might consider an unfair number of cores in my cluster. If you think it would be fairer for me to leave the 80M to 90M range to others to do, please let me know.

Or, alternatively, I could stop at 85M, 84M or 83M.

Please let me know what you all think is appropriate.

Thanks.

Uncwilly · 2009-09-10, 23:11

shameless plug for help in the 100m digit area.

2009-09-10, 16:48	#43
chalsall If I May "Chris Halsall" Sep 2002 Barbados 2×11²×47 Posts	Hey all. I'm in the process of bringing the last ~5000 unreserved exponents in the 91M - 93M up to 64 bits. Should be finished Sunday. I was planning to then start working down the 87M to 82M range, starting with 86M - 87M. However, I don't like to step on anyone's toes, and I have what some might consider an unfair number of cores in my cluster. If you think it would be fairer for me to leave the 80M to 90M range to others to do, please let me know. Or, alternatively, I could stop at 85M, 84M or 83M. Please let me know what you all think is appropriate. Thanks. Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2009-09-10 at 16:48 Reason: s/exponents in/unreserved exponents in/

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
76.5-77M to 63 bits	lycorn	Lone Mersenne Hunters	2	2007-05-25 21:32
64 bits versus 32 bits Windows	S485122	Software	2	2006-10-31 19:14
52.0M - 52.1M to 63 bits	Rde	Lone Mersenne Hunters	4	2006-10-14 18:21
42.6 - 43.0M to 61 bits	MrHappy	Lone Mersenne Hunters	6	2006-05-26 01:10
35-35.2 to 62 bits, cont from 61 bits	Khemikal796	Lone Mersenne Hunters	12	2005-12-01 21:35

2009-08-17, 04:28	#34
petrw1 1976 Toyota Corona years forever! "Wayne" Nov 2006 Saskatchewan, Canada 12315₈ Posts	Less than 10,000 left unassigned... (about 9,800).

2009-08-19, 18:27	#35
petrw1 1976 Toyota Corona years forever! "Wayne" Nov 2006 Saskatchewan, Canada 3·5²·71 Posts	Looks like Sunfish has joined us in the 8028 and 8029 ranges. 9,145 left unassigned in the ranges: 80300000-80499999 80600000-80779999

2009-08-21, 13:34	#37
petrw1 1976 Toyota Corona years forever! "Wayne" Nov 2006 Saskatchewan, Canada 3·5²·71 Posts	Welcome aboard

2009-09-03, 11:28	#38
garo Aug 2002 Termonfeckin, IE 2⁴·173 Posts	I am taking 8065 to 8072. That leaves 8036 to 8050.

2009-09-07, 14:23	#40
markr "Mark" Feb 2003 Sydney 3·191 Posts	Taking 8046 to 8050. 8036 to 8046 remains unassigned.

2009-09-09, 15:03	#41
petrw1 1976 Toyota Corona years forever! "Wayne" Nov 2006 Saskatchewan, Canada 3×5²×71 Posts	Wow in the last month the number of exponents under 100M that are less than 64 bits have dropped from over 330K to under 150K. At the rate factoring is progressing by year end there could be no exponents below 1B factored to less than 64 bits.

2009-09-09, 15:13	#42
garo Aug 2002 Termonfeckin, IE 5320₈ Posts	Thanks to chalsall!

2009-09-10, 23:11	#44
Uncwilly 6809 > 6502 """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 10101100111011₂ Posts	shameless plug for help in the 100m digit area.