![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
May 2009
Dedham Massachusetts USA
3·281 Posts |
211788 - wrong in the database.
I was suprised to find this value was longer than 276. Looking at it, it jumps from 85 to 166 digits in one step Is there a specific thread I should post db problems? Last fiddled with by Greebley on 2009-06-20 at 15:27 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Nov 2008
2·33·43 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
May 2009
Dedham Massachusetts USA
11010010112 Posts |
I don't see a sticky thread with the word database in it - whats it called?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Oct 2004
Austria
2·17·73 Posts |
Quote:
http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=11119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
May 2009
Dedham Massachusetts USA
3×281 Posts |
I noticed another issue. If you get a factor like 4967^2 in your *.elf series submitted with aliqueit -s, the database doesn't handle it. I had to factor this square manually to resolve
Is this also known? Last fiddled with by Greebley on 2009-06-20 at 17:50 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Nov 2008
44228 Posts |
It is known. The database only trial factors up to 2000 automatically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
May 2009
Dedham Massachusetts USA
3×281 Posts |
This seems to be my day for finding database issues:
for sequence 125970 entry 107 is wrong - it has a different number than it should. This is what it should be: 106 . 79289831227886721316 = 2^2 * 7 * 19 * 10337827 * 14417056519 107 . 87636145410556465884 = 2^2 * 3 * 7 * 79 * 269 * 49093569496201 Note that you can tell the other value is wrong because it ends 64, but the sigma has 19+1 factor and 144..519+1 factor and so ends 00, but ...00 - ...16 means the next one should end ...84. I tried sending the correct sequence to the DB, but it didn't update to the correct value. Also what does the CF mean? (instead of ff) Do I need to post in the other thread mentioned to get this fixed? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
306210 Posts |
Quote:
(can seen by choosing a number from database and a '?' right to the 'status' is shown: so here: FF Composite, fully factored CF Composite, factors known C Composite, no factors known P Definitely prime Prp Probably prime send Syd (the Guru of the Factoring Database) a PM with this error. one question: did you uploaded/worked on that seq? the database-id from index 106 is at 39M, so some time ago (about a week or two i think), the id from index 107 is very new! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
May 2009
Dedham Massachusetts USA
11010010112 Posts |
Quote:
I have noticed an issue where two lines occur on the same line in my alq_*.elf output for aliqueit, but that usually means the single index is broken and I have fixed those and had the sequence correct. I will try to make sure I don't pass in the doubled lines just in case though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
May 2009
Dedham Massachusetts USA
11010010112 Posts |
Going to use this thread to keep track of broken ends of the sequences.
Broken so far: 125970 - Index 107 211788 - Index 963 or 964 287730 - Index 338 444378 - Index 379 309316 - Index 466 (2^10 instead of 2^5) Note that I was purposefully trying to get some of the shortest sequences higher (c 60 or more), so the fact that I am finding so many isn't really suprising - those sequences might have been submitted, but didn't add correctly and so were short. Last fiddled with by Greebley on 2009-06-22 at 02:12 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Database for k-b-b's: | 3.14159 | Miscellaneous Math | 325 | 2016-04-09 17:45 |
| Database question | Xyzzy | Forum Feedback | 0 | 2012-04-01 15:37 |
| NPLB Database | IronBits | No Prime Left Behind | 177 | 2009-10-10 09:00 |
| database.zip | HiddenWarrior | Data | 1 | 2004-03-29 03:53 |
| Database layout | Prime95 | PrimeNet | 1 | 2003-01-18 00:49 |