![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
16238 Posts |
On the old homepage there used to be a link to the benchmark page where you could enter your CPU type and then the exponent you were testing and it would approximate the duration required for that LL. I think the current benchmark page operates in a similar fashion, but it does not give the range of exponents that I was wanting and estimate for. Is there another place/way that I can accomplish this? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
4,691 Posts |
Quote:
http://mersenne-aries.sili.net/credit.php |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
10010110100102 Posts |
Quote:
Luigi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Dec 2007
Cleves, Germany
2×5×53 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
10010110100102 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
16238 Posts |
Very impressive but I was looking for one that would give an estimate in days for a certain size exponent based upon my CPU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Aug 2002
North San Diego County
68510 Posts |
Web archive benchmark page. Not all current processor types represented, but still useful for quick & rough approximations. Also, gives the formula for calculations, so building a spreadsheet for your own processor would be trivial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
16238 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
100110010110102 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How many ecm curves per B1 is a good estimate? | EdH | Factoring | 45 | 2013-10-23 13:39 |
| V25.7 TF estimate way out ... or am I? | petrw1 | PrimeNet | 5 | 2008-11-08 02:23 |
| Estimate the new primes | davieddy | Lounge | 34 | 2008-09-17 04:22 |
| A tricky way to estimate pi(x) | XYYXF | Math | 13 | 2006-09-01 15:44 |
| Estimate of sieve duration for 2^811 - 1 | dsouza123 | NFSNET Discussion | 16 | 2004-03-12 15:28 |