![]() |
|
|
#210 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
11101011100012 Posts |
I tried to run tracegen and it just hangs. Ideas anyone?
I'm tracing an mprime built on my local Linux system. |
|
|
|
|
|
#211 |
|
Aug 2002
52510 Posts |
I was just wondering how this project was doing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#212 | |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
11101011100012 Posts |
Quote:
Further analysis via AMD's CodeAnalyst is difficult - it crashes my P4 and hangs when running mprime on the Opteron. I'm entering a very busy period, but it seems the next best step is to recode the assembly snipets I'm trying to benchmark in gas and build a 64-bit executable to run CodeAnalyst on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#213 |
|
Nov 2003
European Union
23×13 Posts |
because somebody in another message reffered to "734pin" athlon64 etc:
AMD 64bit models: Athlon 64 3200+: 754pin, 2GHz, single channel memory, about $500 Athlon64 FX: 940pin, 2.2GHz, dual channel memory, about $700-900, identical to Opteron 14x, No SMP support. Opteron 140/142/144/146: 940pin, 1.4ghz/1.6/1.8/2ghz, dual channel memory, about $240 for model 140 or 240 at 1.4ghz Opteron models 240 are for dual processor systems and have SMP support. prices are not right, they just indicate the "level" of the expenses needed to buy the cpu. Last fiddled with by optim on 2003-11-12 at 20:48 |
|
|
|
|
|
#214 | |
|
Aug 2002
3×83 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#215 |
|
Oct 2002
2610 Posts |
After having donations for funding an Opteron system and identifing the bottle neck - coding ceases.
I bet if this was an Intel processor we would have had continuous work until a fix was found. This type of non-support for AMD is why I have turned off 12 of my 14 prime95 clients. SALEM |
|
|
|
|
|
#216 |
|
"Mike"
Aug 2002
2×23×179 Posts |
Actually, there are people logged into the Opteron quite a bit working on stuff... Just because it isn't posted here doesn't mean work isn't being done...
BTW, if you want an account to help let me know! |
|
|
|
|
|
#217 |
|
Sep 2003
5·11·47 Posts |
Salem,
Your attitude is unhelpful. The machines you turned off are no doubt non-64 Athlons which wouldn't benefit from the Opteron optimization anyway. So what's the point? Instead of conspiracy theories, let's try to come up with constructive "thinking-outside-the-box" solutions. I started a thread for this: http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthr...&threadid=1742 |
|
|
|
|
|
#218 |
|
Aug 2002
3×37 Posts |
Salem,
Since I've been working in this opteron on Glucas, their speed has rised about a 15%. And other people is working in mprime/prime95 trying to do the things better and faster Guillermo |
|
|
|
|
|
#219 |
|
"Mike"
Aug 2002
202A16 Posts |
Code:
Linux opteron 2.6.0 #2 Thu Dec 18 01:22:39 EST 2003 x86_64 unknown unknown GNU/Linux |
|
|
|
|
|
#220 | |
|
Oct 2002
2·13 Posts |
Quote:
to see that work is continuing on the AMD64 client.After the hollidays I will be configuring my dual Opteron 240 system as my main work station on Windows 2000. I am willing to help in testing. Is there a site to download these alpha/beta AMD64 clients? Thanks SALEM |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Opteron is Hyperthreaded ? | bgbeuning | Information & Answers | 3 | 2016-01-10 08:26 |
| Opteron web server... | Xyzzy | Lounge | 14 | 2003-11-05 23:07 |
| Opteron Bottleneck?? | Prime95 | Hardware | 31 | 2003-09-17 06:54 |
| AMD Opteron | naclosagc | Software | 27 | 2003-08-10 19:14 |
| What will an AMD Opteron be classified as ? | dsouza123 | Software | 4 | 2003-08-02 14:29 |