![]() |
|
|
#78 | ||
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
186916 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Xyzzy, what's your take on this? Would it be possible/easy for you to do such an export? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#79 | |
|
Aug 2003
52 Posts |
Quote:
Of course exporting the whole database would have privacy concerns too as that would include PM's (though that could be excluded). Would be a LOT of work now that I've looked at it somewhat.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
186916 Posts |
Quote:
However, the only other alternative to transferring all the posts that I can think of would be to have the NPLB forum here at mersenneforum moved to "archived projects", and then we simply copy over all of the most important information manually at the new forum; we could then set up a subforum there labeled "Old NPLB forum @ mersenneforum.org" which redirects to the one here, which would be locked and in Archived Projects. What's everyone's opinion on this? Would leaving most of the non-essential posts here at mersennforum and simply redirecting to them as described above be workable? Or would it potentially derail a lot of useful, active threads? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Dec 2005
1001110012 Posts |
We really only have a few really active threads, and that varies depending on the ranges we are working on. So you should be able to copy over or reconstruct those few threads on the new forum, and just do what you mentioned IRT archiving.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22×23×31 Posts |
I know Gary is your basic pack rat (only meant in the kindest of ways). I think we need Gary's thoughts on these things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Meanwhile, something else I had been considering is the structure of the forum. How does everyone like the following? Code:
NPLB Forum +No Prime Left Behind --New? Start here! --General Discussion --Drives & Primes --Old NPLB forum @ mersenneforum.org >> redirects to old forum* +Raiders of the Lost Primes --ROLP Team Forum +Forum/Administration --Forum Feedback --Stats/Website --Project Administration * not needed if we end up being able to copy over all the stuff from the old forum -The "New? Start here!" form would contain threads such as the "Welcome/join us" thread, our vision statement, and the threads containing instructions on how to set up and run LLRnet and manual LLR. Probably the "LLRnet servers for NPLB" thread should go here, too. -General Discussion would contain, essentially, everything that doesn't pigeonhole easily into any of the other categories. For example, this thread would go there, as would rally thread and what have you. -Drives & Primes would contain, as the name suggests, our team drive and report-primes-here threads. Having them in their own forum would definitely help cut down on all those stickies that we've got, most of which are team drives and report-primes-here threads, and which tend to clog up a general discussion forum. -We can leave off the redirect to the old forum if we can indeed copy over all the old posts. -ROLP would get its own category so that it's not taking up valuable screen real estate on top of any of the main NPLB forums, especially since it really isn't an NPLB project forum anyway. -Forum feedback would be for bug reports/feature requests/smiley requests/etc. that are related to the forum. -Stats/Website would be for reporting bugs/requesting features related to the stats system and website. -Project Administration would be for discussing administrative decisions. We already do most of this through PM, which works OK, but sometimes can be a little clunky for discussing things that include multiple people. Probably this forum would only be accessible to users involved in administrative decisions--namely, the mods (Gary, me, Ian, and Karsten) as well as David and Dave. Thoughts, flames, rotten tomatoes? ![]() P.S.: I just thought of a couple possible additions to the above. What if we changed the "Forum/Administration" category to just "Other Stuff" and added a Lounge forum there for off-topic discussion not related to NPLB, ROLP, etc.? Would that be a good idea? Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2009-04-20 at 18:33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Dec 2005
313 Posts |
ROLP ?????????????? Whazzat????????????? Oh yeah, those people that had it handed to them on a platter at the BBQ LOL arf arf, wheez, cof cof cof
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Aug 2003
52 Posts |
Ok, I think this would work. It's the minimal amount of info you'd want.
create table temp (forumid int(10),postid int(10),threadid int(10),username varchar(100),userid int(10),title varchar(250),pagetext mediumtext) insert into temp select b.forumid,a.postid,a.threadid,a.username,a.userid,a.title,a.pagetext from post a join thread b on a.threadid = b.threadid where b.forumid in (a,b,c,d); replacing the a,b,c,d with the forumid's you are interested in. export that table and then I can script something to put it into rss feeds which can be easily fed into the forum. You'd just have to decide which users who have posted your wanted to keep and set them up ahead of time. Any others would be replaced with a default user. (Could add a 'originally posted by xxx' to the bottom of each post if necessary). I just tried this in the free-dc forum and it worked ok Last fiddled with by Bok on 2009-04-20 at 18:50 |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Quote:
Nice work Bok.How about when we set up the forum, we hold off at first on importing the data, to give all of our regulars the chance to register at the new forum. Once they've done so, we can import the data and it should be all set. One quick question: I presume the usernames would have to be *exactly* the same, character-for-character? Regarding an "originally posted by x" at the bottom of each default-user post, that would be great. That way, we can still know who wrote what even if they aren't one of our active regulars and didn't get the chance to register prior to the import (or those, like Flatlander, who have expressed an interest in registering under a different username--unless, of course, that was in jest and I misinterpreted it). ![]() Edit: one other quick question. I noticed that the postid and threadid's are copied over, also; would that potentially mess things up, since mersenneforum has been around for quite a while and has post ID's in the 170,000's by now, whereas NPLB's would be starting over at 1? Or am I misunderstanding how the import works? Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2009-04-20 at 18:56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 | |||
|
Aug 2003
2510 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
EDIT: update temp set pagetext =concat(pagetext,'\n (originally posted by ',username, ' )'); ;) Last fiddled with by Bok on 2009-04-20 at 19:17 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Nov 2005
Tasmania, Australia
2×11 Posts |
The attention the project will get is not from people who have never heard of the DC-Vault before, but it will get the teams that are currently there. As they will be after more points
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DC-Vault Ongoing Challenge for Multiple Projects | Coleslaw | Prime Sierpinski Project | 1 | 2014-06-22 15:21 |
| CPU listing? | Xyzzy | PrimeNet | 4 | 2010-10-05 05:43 |
| listing 15-digit primes | fivemack | Software | 8 | 2009-10-19 20:22 |
| DC-Vault.com | russkris | Lounge | 0 | 2009-04-20 03:38 |
| DC-Vault | em99010pepe | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 0 | 2006-11-19 12:34 |