![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Mar 2004
72·11 Posts |
I just upgraded my ram. I gave it 2500 MB ram for stage 2 testing, and I'm getting "Memory allocation error" over and over. Does that mean I have faulty ram AGAIN?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Mar 2004
72·11 Posts |
I don't know if this is relevant, but my old ram was four 512K sticks of dual channel ram, and the ones I put in just now are 1GB non-dual channel ram.
//EDIT: it doesn't start working until it gets down from 2.5GB allocated to only about 1.1GB allocated for stage 2. Last fiddled with by JuanTutors on 2009-01-29 at 02:44 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
1D6616 Posts |
No. Are you using 25.8? It is linked with the /LARGEADDRESSAWARE option that lets prime95 access more memory under Windows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Mar 2004
72·11 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
2×53×71 Posts |
Memory allocation error is not a sign of bad ram. It is a sign that prime95 is having difficulty getting the OS to allocate memory for prime95 to use. This could be a program bug (or not).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Mar 2004
72·11 Posts |
Is there any way to find out? I just got the RAM. Could be faulty, but I don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
2·53·71 Posts |
Exit prime95. Restart prime95. Run Torture Test. It is better at finding memory problems than P-1 Stage 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Mar 2004
10338 Posts |
I've been running a torture test with two threads since last night, all passed. I have a dual core proc. Should I create another copy of prime95 and start another torture test?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
11101011001102 Posts |
No other torture test is needed. After 12 hours, you are looking pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Apr 2007
Spessart/Germany
2·34 Posts |
I think your trouble comes from the different memory-sticks.
As far as I can see you are running atm 3 sticks 512MB supporting dual-channel and 1 stick 1024MB not supporting dual-channel. I would try another memory setting: bank0 512MB bank1 512 MB bank2 1024 MB bank3 empty you will loose 512 MB, but I think the memory allocation errors could be solved. best regards, Matthias btw: it is not needed to run another instance of prime95 for another torture-test Last fiddled with by MatWur-S530113 on 2009-01-29 at 14:54 Reason: typo |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Jun 2003
7×167 Posts |
Even if you get it working, you may find that your overall performance is better with four sticks of 512MB dual-channel that with a mixture of RAM types, even if the mixture is larger in total.
Last fiddled with by Mr. P-1 on 2009-01-29 at 16:10 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "lanczos error: only trivial dependencies found" with massive oversieving | eigma | Msieve | 21 | 2015-05-28 03:27 |
| "Hybrid Memory Cube" offers 1 Tb/s memory bandwith at just 1.4 mW/Gb/s | ixfd64 | Hardware | 4 | 2011-12-14 21:24 |
| Memory Allocation Error | joel893 | Software | 0 | 2008-06-03 14:54 |
| "Feature" request: Keep new B2 value when memory allotment increased | JuanTutors | Software | 3 | 2006-12-18 06:31 |
| Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier? | nitai1999 | Software | 7 | 2004-08-26 18:12 |