![]() |
|
|
#78 |
|
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
2·5·23 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Jun 2008
4816 Posts |
I don't think it is wise to have those 'is definitely prime' buttons out in the open. I'm afraid this is somehow gonna lead to pollution (unintentional, spiders, intentional) of your fine database, which would be a shame imo.
Perhaps you can mark primes from 'trusted' sources upon import? An alternative would be to add some sort of user registration and input history, so errors can be tracked. Other ideas? About the Mersenne factorizations: did you by any chance forget to input lowM.txt? I had a look at M5000 - it contained all factors from M2500 (from factoredM.txt), but missed the two smallest ones from lowM.txt. After having inputted them, the digit count of the remaining cofactor is still off btw. |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
2·5·23 Posts |
User registration together with input history, login and so on is a quite complex task, but eventually I can even use it together with some reservation/ECM efforts tool.
But maybe .. how complex is it to prove a number definitely prime, say up to 1000 digits with ECPP? Are any tools available? Indeed, i forgot to import the factors from lowM.txt. In case of M5000, can you tell me which factors are missing? |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Quote:
At any rate, from what I can tell, PARI would be much more scriptable, and it probably wouldn't be too hard to set up into the existing worker system so that primality-proving jobs could be queued up and fed to all the workers like is already done with ECM and TF work. Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2009-01-14 at 16:47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
23·3·112 Posts |
i just want to reach the link in post #7 but at work it's blocked by our webfilter:
Code:
URL: http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php URL-Kategorien: Malware try here: http://filterdb.iss.net/urlcheck/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Jun 2008
23×32 Posts |
Since M2500 is fully factored, they must originate from 2^2500+1, which currently shows a 665 digit composite (after I hit ECM-medium to remove a few digits).
Edgingtons data suggests that the composite can be reduced to 580 digits. I don't know where to look for the remaining 85 digits of prime(s) - the Cunningham tables only go to 2400. [edit] I had a look at M2398. It showed a 530-digit composite (id=21276431). However, several implied factors from M767 were missing. After having 'submitted' them, the digit count agrees with Edgington. I suggest doing something like Code:
forall factors f of Mx
submit f to M(kx) with k=2,3,...
Last fiddled with by J.F. on 2009-01-14 at 18:28 Reason: M2398 |
|
|
|
|
|
#85 | ||
|
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
3468 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Nov 2008
2×33×43 Posts |
Code:
3 x 5^5 x 11 x 17 x 31 x 41 x 101 x 251 x 401 x 601 x 1801 x 4001 x 4051 x 7001 x 8101 x 28001 x 61681 x 96001 x 160001 x 268501 x 340801 x 1074001 x 2020001 x 2787601 x 3775501 x 22624001 x 37177501 x 107580001 x 229668251 x 831172501 x 2259150001 x 3173389601 x 14321535001 x 269089806001 x 1481124532001 x 619324035675566251 x 1277297679372570001 x 4710883168879506001 x 47970133603445383501 x 94291866932171243501 x 5519485418336288303251 x 232983411264923603130001 x 573759820507018639639785001 x 983262166270913562877993411320001 x 633746672116596658276533517443227501 x 18152902839291497575027462639977160832701118299213751 x 246053469753590746981511859818675718355368494592178751 x 23072017280360209143853190404178284560740949254655131346786858037350918591251 x 8877945148742945001146041439025147034098690503591013177336356694416517527310181938001 x 167151693059203651258538223678521800139589649629368247829683865124002155584217612884019447563002501 x 45712845832064476909251288412537780542141386629649967711230003222863831555000707453689906421700439212068044560931077031315106846707799052501 x 2952514364581316337639834904034501808253955768505847014917395820453653708312223506491002496302532891440120688361870627195018283686594739576042156463430228261599130139157586670190936850324484407773053651741800071409643774842685094764505897386290434816137207257527045648890038980443489148266586061742881796117450662972816739833595245680317687294799762715910575282701475446274531684090484014335382380426254949454811556963459149908837253490252431670151904810696439528202733056843409785493492110147847556186485233154284233119314768888487458979069953852588599421726292742704836614070001(the C580) Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2009-01-14 at 20:10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Jun 2008
23×32 Posts |
Error in my previous post: I believe M2398 should be M2301. Doesn't matter much.
@10metreh: aha, may I ask where did you come across that 85 digit prime? |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2·7·677 Posts |
2,500+ | 2,2500+
2,100+ | 2,500+ 2,500+/2,100+ factors easily -> p85 comes from there. p140 and p99 come from 1250L,M of course Code:
1250L (10M,50L,250M) 37177501.831172501.633746672116596658276533517443227501.P99
M (2,10L,50M,250L) 5*.14321535001.P140
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Database for k-b-b's: | 3.14159 | Miscellaneous Math | 325 | 2016-04-09 17:45 |
| Factoring database issues | Mini-Geek | Factoring | 5 | 2009-07-01 11:51 |
| database.zip | HiddenWarrior | Data | 1 | 2004-03-29 03:53 |
| Database layout | Prime95 | PrimeNet | 1 | 2003-01-18 00:49 |
| Is there a performance database? | Joe O | Lounge | 35 | 2002-09-06 20:19 |