![]() |
|
|
#23 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
624910 Posts |
Quote:
As for affinity: try running the command ./sr2sieve -h in your sr2sieve directory. That's the same as "sr2sieve -h" on Windows; it will give you a complete listing of all the command line flags that sr2sieve supports, including ones that set affinity. Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2008-12-26 at 23:41 |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
Okay, the scoreboard seems to be correct SO,
I'll take 4250 - 5850. That should fill me up till about the Jan 16th. |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
242338 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
31×67 Posts |
It was the 64bit version from the link you provided. I assume if I've accidentally installed 32bit Ubuntu, 64 bit sr2sieve wouldn't run at all?
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
Quote:
I would suggest posting about your situation in this thread, which is where Geoff usually posts general information about the sr*sieve programs. Maybe he'll know what's going on here. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
31×67 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
186916 Posts |
Quote:
If it's running lower than it should, you can use the CPU Frequency Scaling Monitors to fix this. Open a terminal window, and run the command "sudo dpkg-reconfigure gnome-applets" (without quotes). Enter your password when prompted. It will ask you whether or not to allow the cpufreq-selector applet to have root privileges; select Yes and press Enter. You will be dumped back at the terminal prompt; now close the terminal. Now, if you left-click on the applet, you'll see options to manually set the CPU to a particular frequency, as well as multiple predefined settings (referred to as "governors")--namely, "Conservative", "Ondemand", "Performance", and "Powersave". Choose either the highest clock speed level, or the "Performance" governor, and you should be in business. ![]() Hope this helps! ![]() Max
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
81D16 Posts |
Thanks Max.
![]() That showed me that it was running at stock (1.8GHz) instead of 2.38GHz. For some reason the BIOS had reset the speed when I rebooted. I'm now getting slightly better p/sec than my quad @ 3.15Ghz. So 64bit is running about 33% faster than 32bit. (Maybe the caches are different. I'll check it out later.) |
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Quote:
Though, I can't imagine how the caches would be different between operating systems...I would instead presume that the boost only being 33% is due entirely to the 64-bit system being clocked at 2.38Ghz rather than the 3.15Ghz 32-bit comparison machine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Taking 5850G-5900G. I'll start this tomorrow (my 5th Drive range should finish overnight).
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team drive #10 k=1400-2000 n=500K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 61 | 2013-01-30 16:08 |
| Team drive #9 k=1005-2000 n=50K-350K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 236 | 2009-06-25 10:04 |
| Sieving drive for k=1003-2000 n=500K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 160 | 2009-05-10 00:50 |
| k=1005-1400 n=200K-500K results fill in | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 55 | 2009-04-16 11:33 |
| Team drive #8 k=1400-2000 n=350K-500K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 101 | 2009-04-08 02:11 |