LLRNet linux unable to resolve hostnames

nuggetprime · 2008-12-20, 12:17

LLRNet(linux) seems to be unable to resolve hostnames(when I give "nplb.dynip.telepac.pt" as server, it prints: "unknown host nplb.dynip.telepac.pt" but when I enter the IP adress it works. The same is for "localhost" vs "127.0.0.1". Well,since Carlos' server has dynamic IPs, I can't simply give a fixed IP.
Are you also having these problems?

--nuggetprime

em99010pepe · 2008-12-20, 12:30

Change port to 6000.

nuggetprime · 2008-12-20, 12:46

It's the same then. Is port 6000 also with dynamic IPs?

em99010pepe · 2008-12-20, 12:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by nuggetprime

It's the same then. Is port 6000 also with dynamic IPs?

Yes but Gary managed under linux to get, test and send a candidate to C6000.

nuggetprime · 2008-12-20, 13:00

Interesting... The SR5 version can resolve...

em99010pepe · 2008-12-20, 13:07

We need more people to test the server (nplb.dynip.telepac.pt port 6000)

nuggetprime · 2008-12-20, 13:08

The issue is for ANY server.

em99010pepe · 2008-12-20, 13:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by nuggetprime

The issue is for ANY server.

Oh...I though it was only for my server because I changed my modem and I was getting worried. You need to ask Gary or Max because they run llrnet under linux.

Carlos

nuggetprime · 2008-12-20, 13:16

The SR5 binary is as fast as the NPLB binary,so I see no reason to not use it.
Anyway,If Max/Gary read this and have an advice running it using their binary, that would be nice.

--nuggetprime

em99010pepe · 2008-12-20, 13:47

Did you process this candidate?

user=5
[2008-12-20 13:38]
341*2^698258-1 is not prime.

nuggetprime · 2008-12-20, 14:00

Not that I know. Have you got the following pairs I processed:341/698370 and 341/698390?

2008-12-20, 12:17	#1
nuggetprime Mar 2007 Austria 2·151 Posts	LLRNet linux unable to resolve hostnames LLRNet(linux) seems to be unable to resolve hostnames(when I give "nplb.dynip.telepac.pt" as server, it prints: "unknown host nplb.dynip.telepac.pt" but when I enter the IP adress it works. The same is for "localhost" vs "127.0.0.1". Well,since Carlos' server has dynamic IPs, I can't simply give a fixed IP. Are you also having these problems? --nuggetprime

2008-12-20, 12:46	#3
nuggetprime Mar 2007 Austria 302₁₀ Posts	It's the same then. Is port 6000 also with dynamic IPs? Last fiddled with by nuggetprime on 2008-12-20 at 12:46

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Relatively simple question I've been unable to resolve	Dubslow	Other Mathematical Topics	5	2015-11-28 06:24
Unable to download 64bit Linux version	brianread	PrimeNet	2	2012-01-10 17:27
Linux build for LLRNet client available!	axn	Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5	9	2008-11-26 03:47
llrnet and linux 64 bits ...	tnerual	No Prime Left Behind	13	2008-07-13 19:04
Linux llrnet questions	PhilF	Prime Sierpinski Project	1	2005-12-16 08:36

2008-12-20, 12:30	#2
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2·5·283 Posts	Change port to 6000.

2008-12-20, 13:00	#5
nuggetprime Mar 2007 Austria 2·151 Posts	Interesting... The SR5 version can resolve...

2008-12-20, 13:07	#6
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2·5·283 Posts	We need more people to test the server (nplb.dynip.telepac.pt port 6000)

2008-12-20, 13:08	#7
nuggetprime Mar 2007 Austria 302₁₀ Posts	The issue is for ANY server.

2008-12-20, 13:16	#9
nuggetprime Mar 2007 Austria 2·151 Posts	The SR5 binary is as fast as the NPLB binary,so I see no reason to not use it. Anyway,If Max/Gary read this and have an advice running it using their binary, that would be nice. --nuggetprime

2008-12-20, 13:47	#10
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2830₁₀ Posts	Did you process this candidate? user=5 [2008-12-20 13:38] 341*2^698258-1 is not prime.

2008-12-20, 14:00	#11
nuggetprime Mar 2007 Austria 100101110₂ Posts	Not that I know. Have you got the following pairs I processed:341/698370 and 341/698390?