![]() |
|
|
#133 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101·103 Posts |
I assume you know that post was intended for Max. He only reserved 1 of 2 k's remaining on Sierp base 23 and since the file contains both k's, I'm wondering if he missed it.
Quote:
Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-12-11 at 09:10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#134 | |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
54448 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
2×1,453 Posts |
new PRP's
Code:
87064 8031 64760 8046 244466 8054 179312 8064 132574 8065 131290 8091 206962 8091 223562 8146 17468 8160 70526 8164 249296 8174 62008 8195 122156 8212 46120 8239 89338 8245 272306 8268 227564 8278 46288 8279 81772 8305 21346 8327 57848 8338 81532 8353 100504 8365 135062 8366 101648 8368 165608 8378 36214 8431 to Gary: the PRP's from post 149 are missing on your reservation-page for base 35. jerky job.... no time to update the pages... i know that too...
Last fiddled with by kar_bon on 2008-12-12 at 09:28 |
|
|
|
|
|
#136 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101·103 Posts |
Quote:
Thanks for letting me know. You were doing too many posts for base 35! I'm bound to miss some of them. It wasn't a matter of time. I completely missed that post.I'm sure I would have noticed when I went to post these primes; wondering why there was a large n-range gap in primes. As I sit, I've been updating the Riesel pages for bases > 50 so I'll get these and post 149 for base 35 added in a little while. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-12-12 at 11:42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101·103 Posts |
To all:
I have my web pages updated for Riesel bases up to 80 now. What takes quite a while is correctly generalizing the algebraic factors. I had already found them and took them into account on the k's remaining that I posted previously. But to properly prove a conjecture, they need to be generalized, especially if we eventually go to proving the 2nd or 3rd conjectured k-value in the future. Quite a few of the bases have them that allowed k's to be removed. The one that took the longest was Riesel base 54. It has 2 different sets of algebraic factors that are very similar to Riesel base 24. Both kinds were needed to eliminate k=4, 6, and 9. I've haven't uploaded the pages yet but will do so shortly. I'm beat now and will do some more updating Friday afternoon. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-12-12 at 11:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
#138 | |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
31·67 Posts |
Quote:
Bases 93 and 100 are both at n>37k with no primes. :surprised It must be Max's turn to find one. I'll also take Riesel base 72 to at least n=20k. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#139 | |
|
Jun 2003
Oxford, UK
29·67 Posts |
Quote:
As part of the CRT calculation 37 needs to appear in the power series as a factor, which it does when k is 1mod37 or 36mod37. This is therefore not a algebraic issue, in the sense of what you define it to be. There exist a lot of k that will have 37 contributing to eliminating odd or even n; or 5,13,41 eliminating one in every four n. Most k that are difficult to eliminate have only selected n not covered by primes that are of low modulo order in that base. In the general case, we are saying that for odd bases b, then the integer x={[b+1]/2} is 2 modulo order base b, and consequently two values of k == 1modx or-1modx provide part cover for n = even or odd respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#140 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101·103 Posts |
Quote:
Yep, I missed the reservation on bases 93 and 100. Are you still keeping them reserved? If so, how high will you be taking them? Right now, I've got you reserved for bases 72, 93, and 100. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#141 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101·103 Posts |
Quote:
A couple of things here: I realize I have thrown around the term "contains algebraic factors" a little loosely at times. Frequently when I've stated that, I should have been saying: "Trivial factors that combine with algebraic factors to make a full covering set." I'm not sure what you mean by a "prime free power series" or a "CRT solution". We do know this about base 73: We have searched all k where k is not == (1 mod 2) nor (1 mod 3), which have a trivial factor of 2 and 3 respectively. All remaining k's had a prime (after eliminating k=36) so the "conjecture" of k=408 is now proven. The last k to fall was k=242 with a prime at n=2280. I did an extensive analysis last night of k's that were perfect squares for Riesel base 73 all the way up to k=50^2. Surprisingly, there were no other k's except for k=36 where trivial factor(s) on odd-n combined with algebraic factors on even-n to make a full covering set. (I think I said it right that time. lol) I suspect there are more k's for this base that have such factors but I didn't go high enough to find them and don't quite have the math skills to generalize it out further using modulo arithmetic or additional "kinds" of algebraic factors for this specific base. Also about my post that you quoted: It was rather ludicrous and proved nothing. I stated as such in my last post where I actually analyzed the modulo arithmetic involved specifically for 36*73^n-1 about this issue with the following: "For the time being, the above that I stated is not really a proof at all, it essentially just restates the fact that all odd-n are == (0 mod 37) in a different way. When I thought about it, it was kind of a stupid post by me. I'm glad the higher-math folks didn't attack me. They could have easily. lol" So thanks for not attacking me too badly on it. ![]() Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-12-13 at 07:03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#142 | ||||
|
Jun 2003
Oxford, UK
29·67 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
CRT= Chinese Remainder Theorem Quote:
36*73^n-1 = 6^2*73^n (even) is square therefore factors algebraically. Quote:
Then y*b^2a-1, a=integer, factorises into (x*b^a-1)(x*b^a+1) This provides algebraic cover at n=even We also require y+1 to be a prime that is 2 modulo order b, and this is provided by the primitive prime factors of b^2-1 = primitive prime factors of (b+1), of which, for b=73, there is 1, p=37 For cover at n odd in k*b^n-1, then k==ymodp==36mod37 Or alternatively x^2==-1mod37..... x^2+1=0mod37 The only valid solution is given by x=6 (x=31 provides that 31^2*b^n-1=even, and therefore trivial) Think thats right |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#143 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101×103 Posts |
Riesel base 55 is at n=22K; one prime so far:
2022*55^19568-1 is prime This is somewhat disappointing. I had expected at least 3 primes for n=15K-25K on this very prime base. With only 13 k's remaining on a conjecture of k=6852, it should be kicking out primes pretty quickly at all ranges. Perhaps at least 2 will come in the next n=3K range. Gary |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Riesel base 3 reservations/statuses/primes | KEP | Conjectures 'R Us | 1107 | 2021-07-26 18:37 |
| Bases 501-1030 reservations/statuses/primes | KEP | Conjectures 'R Us | 3913 | 2021-07-26 09:58 |
| Bases 251-500 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 2300 | 2021-07-25 07:38 |
| Bases 6-32 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 1397 | 2021-07-25 07:07 |
| Bases 101-250 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 905 | 2021-07-18 16:55 |