|
2008-11-27, 11:08
|
#1 |
Nov 2008
2×33×43 Posts |
New GGNFS problem
When I try to run procrels, it finds one factor and then a Windows error window appears:
"procrels.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry about this inconvenience. Please tell Microsoft about this problem." We have all encountered this message. The only question is, what caused procrels to stop working? |
|
|
|
2008-11-27, 13:34
|
#2 |
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471
118910 Posts |
Don't use procrels anymore. pol51 and especially msieve produce much better polynomials.
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-27, 15:12
|
#3 | |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
5,881 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-27, 18:59
|
#4 | |
|
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471
29×41 Posts |
Quote:
 Dunno how i confussed this with the old polyselect
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-27, 19:54
|
#5 |
|
Nov 2008
2×33×43 Posts |
I am now using factLat.pl but an error message appears:
Could not find default parameter file c:/Programme/Primes/ggnfs/def-par.txt! The path here has the slashes the wrong way round and is nothing like my filepath. def-par.txt is in my gnfs folder. So why does factLat.pl think def-par.txt is not there? |
|
|
|
|
2008-11-27, 19:59
|
#6 | |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
5,881 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-27, 21:42
|
#7 |
|
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471
22458 Posts |
May I advise you to use factmsieve.pl
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-28, 09:23
|
#8 | |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
5,881 Posts |
Quote:
for the size of numbers we are going to be doing (100-~110) factlat.pl wont be too much slower there are too many bugs in it and i dont really trust it |
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-28, 15:46
|
#9 |
|
Nov 2008
44228 Posts |
Do you mean edit the script?
If so, in how many places is a path mentioned? |
|
|
|
|
2008-11-28, 17:20
|
#10 | |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
5,881 Posts |
Quote:
two |
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-28, 18:10
|
#11 |
|
Nov 2008
2×33×43 Posts |
I am not a GNFS expert. When you make a poly with msieve, it has R0 and R1 values. Which one do you use for a GGNFS "m" value? When using R0 I get a polynomial error. Same with R1.
10metreh P.S. Henry, I think my joining has induced an increase in your posting rate. Do you agree? Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2008-11-28 at 18:31 |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Factoring with GGNFS | VolMike | Factoring | 19 | 2007-10-22 18:12 |
| GGNFS or something better? | Zeta-Flux | Factoring | 1 | 2007-08-07 22:40 |
| ggnfs sqrt problem | hallstei | Factoring | 7 | 2007-05-01 12:51 |
| How do you get around the |a|<2^31 problem in ggnfs? | fivemack | Factoring | 4 | 2007-03-22 01:00 |
| ggnfs | ATH | Factoring | 3 | 2006-08-12 22:50 |
