![]() |
|
|
#111 |
|
May 2008
21078 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
10B516 Posts |
I'll take these two (ETA 04-Nov-2008):
Code:
Test=34803089,63,0 Test=34803121,63,0 Last fiddled with by James Heinrich on 2008-10-10 at 01:35 |
|
|
|
|
|
#113 |
|
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
427710 Posts |
Well, that one was easy:
Code:
[Tue Oct 21 03:11:05 2008] P-1 found a factor in stage #2, B1=430000, B2=12577500. UID: JamesHeinrich/3600x2v257, M34803121 has a factor: 7029380325245118575639, AID: ADEC452221B596592F6AC6DFCF86332F |
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA
2×47×67 Posts |
I did trial factoring to 2^68 and P-1 on this number, so you guys can now update it to "Test=34809793,68,1" instead.
(I was going to submit this to the v5 server, also, via the manual results form, but as described in the "PrimeNet v5 upgrade" thread in the PrimeNet forum, I got an error when I tried to log in. I will report these ranges to the server later on when I can log in.)[Sat Nov 1 10:20:24 2008] UID: mdettweiler/Core2Duo, M34809793 no factor to 2^68, Wc2: 4E2BE7AC [Sat Nov 1 21:08:13 2008] UID: mdettweiler/Core2Duo, M34809793 completed P-1, B1=195000, B2=4095000, Wc2: 84EE378A |
|
|
|
|
|
#115 | |
|
Dec 2007
Cleves, Germany
21216 Posts |
Quote:
BTW... lousy P-1 limits you have. I use B1=415000, B2=11205000... Last fiddled with by ckdo on 2008-11-02 at 07:11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#116 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA
2·47·67 Posts |
Quote:
I thought that it wasn't assigned to anyone since this thread said it was unassigned. (No wonder the v5 server didn't want to give it to me! )As for the lousy P-1 limits: I just let mprime pick my B1/B2 based on my RAM settings (I think it's 1300 for both daytime and nighttime; I had ~1500 previously, since my computer has 2 GB of RAM, but for some reason it made the rest of my computer go really slow when I ran it on ~1500, so I decreased it a bit.) Oh, and just to avoid any confusion: I'm not planning on LL testing this number, I was only looking to whack out a quick factor. Of course, I wouldn't have bothered if I had known that you had it reserved--next time I'll be sure to check. ![]() Edit: I checked it on v5, and saw that it was factored to 2^67 by you (with last reported progress about a month ago), with no P-1. I went ahead and submitted my results anyway, since I figured, hey, at least *some* useful work was done, even though I wasted my time doing 2^63 to 2^67. So, you can go ahead and consider that one as done (unless you'd like to expand the P-1 bounds) in your personal list.
Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2008-11-02 at 14:32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
|
"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney
23D16 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is it OK to pick up expired exponents? | patrik | PrimeNet | 9 | 2014-04-09 23:30 |
| Lowest Unknown Prime | GuyMacon | PrimeNet | 6 | 2011-05-07 03:20 |
| What is the Lowest Rank you can have | crash893 | Data | 7 | 2006-01-26 05:26 |
| How to pick exponents on higher ranges? | edorajh | PrimeNet | 2 | 2004-01-21 13:18 |
| Who has the lowest benchmarks? | delta_t | Hardware | 54 | 2003-08-09 18:36 |