misc. k<300 statuses and primes - Page 2

em99010pepe · 2008-11-01, 18:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beyond

I saw those primes pop on the top 5000 site and checked thru my results. It appears I was running 47 on that machine we found to be giving dubious results on NPLB back in May.

In May you ran 463-473 from Drive 1 and probably llrnet.

mdettweiler · 2008-11-01, 19:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

In May you ran 463-473 from Drive 1 and probably llrnet.

Actually, we found the bad machine when some duplicate (and non-matching) residuals showed up in Beyond's 400K-410K Drive 1 results file (from his internal LLRnet server) when I processed it. So, thus the bad machine was already weeded out by the time he started any further work.

gd_barnes · 2008-11-05, 21:46

I have now completed the double-check on k=47 and 53 up to n=600K as well as extended the new searched range to n=700K.

Previously reported: k=47 had 3 new primes and 1 confirmed prime.
New report: 53*2^582078-1 is confirmed prime.

Karsten, you can mark both k's as complete to n=700K now.

Gary

gd_barnes · 2008-11-11, 12:30

k=47 and 53 are complete to n=1M.

k=47 had 3 new primes and 1 confirmed prime all previously reported.

k=53 had 1 confirmed prime previously reported.

Beyond, for now, they're all yours. We can still take these higher if you want. I was thinking that you said you either started testing again around n=1.2M or tested from some lower point up to n=1.2M. If you have any specifics, we'll be glad to fill in any existing gap in testing.

Gary

gd_barnes · 2008-11-14, 03:59

k=147 testing for Max is at n=738K...nothing to report.

This is the only k<300 effort going on here that I am aware of.

gd_barnes · 2008-11-28, 10:29

k=147 testing for Max is now at n=755K

gd_barnes · 2008-12-02, 10:04

Someone apparently unrelated to RPS just now found a missing top-5000 prime for k=31 here!

This is further evidence about why we double check!

gd_barnes · 2008-12-20, 12:06

I have completed a CRUS reservation so am now putting two cores on k=289 using our 4th drive sieved file. The drive searched it to n=680K and I'll take it to n=800K at this time. It is probably a 100% double-check effort.

Once this k is past n=700K, all k<300 will be at n>=700K!

My heart is warm: It had been a personal goal of mine that all k<300 would be at n>=700K and that k=300-1001 would be at n>=600K by year end. It looks like we're going to get there. Life is good!

Gary

gd_barnes · 2008-12-20, 12:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

k=147 testing for Max is now at n=755K

Once the 1st drive is complete, I will restart this effort on k=147 for Max. Likely I'll double it to 2 cores to move it along a little bit since it is a higher-weight k.

Gary

gd_barnes · 2008-12-24, 07:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

I have completed a CRUS reservation so am now putting two cores on k=289 using our 4th drive sieved file. The drive searched it to n=680K and I'll take it to n=800K at this time. It is probably a 100% double-check effort.

Once this k is past n=700K, all k<300 will be at n>=700K!

My heart is warm: It had been a personal goal of mine that all k<300 would be at n>=700K and that k=300-1001 would be at n>=600K by year end. It looks like we're going to get there. Life is good!

Gary

k=289 is now complete to n=700K. No primes for n=680K-700K...continuing on to n=800K.

The completion of all k<300 to n=700K and all k=300-1001 to n=600K is now a reality thanks to NPLB's 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th drives! This was the final straggling k needed to get it there. Weeeeeeeeeeee!

Possible goal for the end of 2009: All k<300 to n=850K, k=300-1001 to n=800K, and k=1003-2000 to n=450K. Now THAT would be something!

On another note: k=147 has now restarted on 2 cores.

Gary

henryzz · 2008-12-24, 09:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

k=289 is now complete to n=700K. No primes for n=680K-700K...continuing on to n=800K.

The completion of all k<300 to n=700K and all k=300-1001 to n=600K is now a reality thanks to NPLB's 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th drives! This was the final straggling k needed to get it there. Weeeeeeeeeeee!

Possible goal for the end of 2009: All k<300 to n=850K, k=300-1001 to n=800K, and k=1003-2000 to n=450K. Now THAT would be something!

On another note: k=147 has now restarted on 2 cores.

Gary

why not add to that completing the individual reservations drive

2008-12-02, 10:04	#18
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 10100010011011₂ Posts	Someone apparently unrelated to RPS just now found a missing top-5000 prime for k=31 here! This is further evidence about why we double check! Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-12-02 at 10:05

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Bases 251-500 reservations/statuses/primes	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	2299	2021-07-11 08:19
Bases 101-250 reservations/statuses/primes	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	904	2021-07-06 18:51
Bases 33-100 reservations/statuses/primes	Siemelink	Conjectures 'R Us	1691	2021-07-06 18:50
Bases 6-32 reservations/statuses/primes	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	1394	2021-04-17 15:07
Misc. reserves/statuses/primes for k>2000 & k=1003	gd_barnes	No Prime Left Behind	113	2009-07-30 22:32

2008-11-05, 21:46	#14
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 3³·5·7·11 Posts	I have now completed the double-check on k=47 and 53 up to n=600K as well as extended the new searched range to n=700K. Previously reported: k=47 had 3 new primes and 1 confirmed prime. New report: 53*2^582078-1 is confirmed prime. Karsten, you can mark both k's as complete to n=700K now. Gary

2008-11-11, 12:30	#15
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 3³×5×7×11 Posts	k=47 and 53 are complete to n=1M. k=47 had 3 new primes and 1 confirmed prime all previously reported. k=53 had 1 confirmed prime previously reported. Beyond, for now, they're all yours. We can still take these higher if you want. I was thinking that you said you either started testing again around n=1.2M or tested from some lower point up to n=1.2M. If you have any specifics, we'll be glad to fill in any existing gap in testing. Gary

2008-11-14, 03:59	#16
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 289B₁₆ Posts	k=147 testing for Max is at n=738K...nothing to report. This is the only k<300 effort going on here that I am aware of.

2008-11-28, 10:29	#17
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 3³×5×7×11 Posts	k=147 testing for Max is now at n=755K

2008-12-20, 12:06	#19
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 3³·5·7·11 Posts	I have completed a CRUS reservation so am now putting two cores on k=289 using our 4th drive sieved file. The drive searched it to n=680K and I'll take it to n=800K at this time. It is probably a 100% double-check effort. Once this k is past n=700K, all k<300 will be at n>=700K! My heart is warm: It had been a personal goal of mine that all k<300 would be at n>=700K and that k=300-1001 would be at n>=600K by year end. It looks like we're going to get there. Life is good! Gary