![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
Aug 2002
2·3·29 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Aug 2002
23×32 Posts |
You are not yet doing the Iteration (LL)portion of the test. You are currently doing the p-1 factoring. Your timings look about right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Aug 2002
2×3×29 Posts |
Yah I know its not LL yet, it just looks a bit slow to me. Going for about 3% per hour...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
"Tony Gott"
Aug 2002
Yell, Shetland, UK
22×83 Posts |
Nah, it really is doing fine, don't worry. This is BIG crunching on a 33m
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Aug 2002
23×52 Posts |
33252977 took me a little over 67 hours on a P4 1.8 with 448 Mb allocated. That's about 1.5% per hour...
[Tue May 28 14:29:20 2002] Self-test 1792K passed! [Fri May 31 09:58:40 2002] UID: dswanson/pc1800A, M33252977 completed P-1, B1=385000, B2=10395000, E=2, WY1: 5CE27B7D |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Aug 2002
516 Posts |
If you have another computer (non-P4) you may want to do your factoring on that one and manually move the exponent to the P4 when it is time for the LL test.
If I remember correctly my Duron 1000 MHz is about twice as fast as my P4 1600 MHz when it comes to factoring (although I think that was regular trial factoring and not P-1). So it seemed like a waste to let the P4 do anything other than LL, and now I do all factoring on the Duron. I don't think I ever checked how the two processors compared on P-1. Does anyone have any info on that? (By the way, all this applies to v21.4, I don't know if anything has happened to factoring speed in the more recent versions) |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Aug 2002
2×3×29 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
"Tony Gott"
Aug 2002
Yell, Shetland, UK
1010011002 Posts |
Quote:
New features in Version 22.7 of prime95.exe "Trial factoring above 2^64 on a P4 now uses the SSE2 instructions. This is more than four times as fast as the previous version. " Worth getting the upgrade :D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Aug 2002
23×52 Posts |
Quote:
Test=33252977,68,0 which is now Test=33252977,68,1 I don't have the breakdown for hours in stage 1 vs hours in stage 2. The 67 hours is a bit misleading, since my wife crashed the computer in the middle of the stage 2, so it was down for a few hours before I got home from work to rescue it. :( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Aug 2002
128 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
22·691 Posts |
Hey hey!
Kinda offtopic but just wanted to say hello to dswanson. Thanks for dropping in. I am one of those you contend with for small DC's everyday at 0600GMT. It sucks when you beat me to it :) but much better than going to some random fellow who is going to take months Onwards to proving M38!! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Two questions: | Dubslow | GPU Computing | 1 | 2011-08-05 18:22 |
| Questions about the QS | Carmichael | Factoring | 8 | 2007-04-10 11:30 |
| 5 questions | OmbooHankvald | Factoring | 6 | 2005-08-28 19:31 |
| Questions | OmbooHankvald | Prime Sierpinski Project | 2 | 2005-08-01 20:18 |
| LLR questions | OmbooHankvald | Math | 6 | 2005-06-23 11:42 |