![]() |
|
|
#34 |
|
Sep 2004
B0E16 Posts |
Guys,
Final push on server 7500, less than 2000 candidates to test. At current pace the server will dry in 33 hours, let's try to reduce it to 17 hours or even less. Who is with me (Gary, Max, Henryzz, Tnerual, Glenn)? Moved 4 cores to it. Carlos Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2008-10-17 at 22:05 |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33×5×7×11 Posts |
Quote:
All 5 of my connected quads are on it right now. My other 4 working quads are still working on a large manual range to finish the drive. ETA is ~5 days. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Sep 2004
2×5×283 Posts |
Quote:
Carlos |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
1039510 Posts |
Quote:
I currently have 4 quads running a manual range for this drive. Shortly, I'll be adding the 5 quads to it that had been running LLRnet. I'll take it all from here running the rest of the pairs manually. ~7600 k/n pairs remain. ETA is ~3 days on 9 quads. Thanks to everyone who contributed to the 4th drive! Completing the drive in ~7 weeks was an excellent accomplishment! ![]() The 1st and 3rd drives are now our priority. Ports 400, 443, and 5000 are available with plenty of work in them. Manual files are also available and posted. I'll shift ~60-65% of my resources over to those drives after finishing the manual k/n pairs from this drive. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-10-19 at 05:43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
141518 Posts |
Quote:
Ah well--at least I got a few k/n pairs in before my clients went to sleep. (I've since switched it my llrnet.ironbits.net port 10000 personal server, since it should be on at least for tonight.)As Gary said--thanks to all who helped out with the 4th Drive! I too am somewhat amazed that we were able to do all of 15 k's, for n=600K-1M, in such a short time. All it takes is a little pressure! ![]() Max
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101000100110112 Posts |
As of very early this morning, the 4th drive was officially complete.
We decided mid-stream to stop k=289 at n=680K since it is likely a 100% double-check effort. I will finish that up myself over the next 2-3 months. Thanks to everyone who contributed! We pushed 14 of the 15 k's past most of their neighbors. We also finished in < 8 weeks...a very nice accomplishment on so many k's on a higher n-range for a relatively new project!! ![]() Karsten and Max, as stated in another thread, I'll get to the results here in the next 1-2 weeks. Karsten, you can show all k's at n=1M except k=289, which is at n=680K. NPLB officially unreserves all of the k's. You can put me as reserving k=289 starting from n=680K; not that it matters much for a double-check effort. The 1st drive is the priority now with port 400 higher priority than port 443 since it's at a lower n-range. The 3rd drive on port 5000 can be worked on but requires much less resources to keep up with the 1st drive. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-10-22 at 16:23 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team drive #7 k=800-1001 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 127 | 2011-07-15 14:25 |
| Team drive #6 k=600-800 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 89 | 2011-03-10 12:34 |
| Team drive #5: k=400-600 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 135 | 2010-11-23 14:27 |
| Team drive #1: k=400-1001 n=333.2K-600K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 675 | 2009-02-24 16:37 |
| Team drive #3: k=300-400 n=260K-600K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 255 | 2008-11-12 10:43 |