![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Aug 2002
North San Diego Coun
821 Posts |
Just noticed that under 22.8 and 22.9 the L1 cache size is misreported on my AMD processors. L1 is reported as 64KB instead of 128KB.
I suppose it could be reporting the data cache instead of the entire cache size. (It would be nice if a breakdown was given, if that is the case. :) ) I guess the real question is whether this affects performance... -SDB- |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
827910 Posts |
It does not affect performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Aug 2002
North San Diego Coun
821 Posts |
Whew! :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
17·487 Posts |
I just checked the code. It is reporting only the data cache size.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Aug 2002
North San Diego Coun
821 Posts |
Thanks for checking George. Sorry about making a fuss over a non-issue.
-Scott- |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Aug 2002
2·32·13·37 Posts |
Every question asked means another answer archived for future reference... :)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What's up with the crazy questions for profile edits? | willmore | Forum Feedback | 2 | 2017-02-02 12:44 |
| No stats in profile but computers are listing | pnordlund | PrimeNet | 2 | 2016-02-01 06:45 |
| Incorrect result | bayanne | Information & Answers | 2 | 2013-12-01 09:18 |
| Hardware Profile | storm5510 | Hardware | 6 | 2009-08-19 13:05 |
| Avatars and profile pictures... | Xyzzy | Lounge | 3 | 2005-07-12 23:12 |