![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
E616 Posts |
I'll take that range to get all of them to at least 61bits. Is anyone already working on that range?
I will only report factors to keep the server load small. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Mar 2007
179 Posts |
I am currently working on 999M to 1000M to 62 bits through the v5 server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
2·5·23 Posts |
Okay, i'll leave them out
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Dec 2007
Cleves, Germany
2×5×53 Posts |
I am currently taking 900M-901M to 62 bits, also via V5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
E616 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney
3·191 Posts |
Quote:
Won't that mean 95% of your work will have to be repeated by someone else?? And they won't get the satisfaction of finding factors in the 59-61 bit range. I take it you aren't assigning work through the server. But then you'll need to also watch that the server doesn't start assigning work in this range itself. Basically what I'm clumsily trying to say is, consider reserving your work through the server. But not all at once - ~5,000,000 exponents at once just might be a hit on the server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
23×1,223 Posts |
How can I get the V5 server to assign me work in a desired range like that? Say I wanted to work in the 320M-350M range, how can I get that assigned to me?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
3468 Posts |
how do i exactly assign them? I use my own application for factoring, so i dont have any Wc2-codes to submit
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney
3·191 Posts |
Quote:
There's now a nice alternative: make a file worktodo.add and the client will try to register its contents & add them to worktodo.txt. It doesn't start digesting the .add file right away, and it can take a while to do it. (Or that might be the slowish machine I've tried this on.) But it works. So far the most I've added in one file is ~2500 lines. Usual caveats apply - the v25.x clients & v5 server are still officially in test phase, so all this is unofficial and the right way might be totally different eg when proper procedures are made. Obviously registering assignments makes some server traffic in either alternative, but not many people are using v5 yet. I haven't actually added something that's already assigned to someone else, but I hope the server would reject it. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| On to 999M -- to 70 Bits | petrw1 | LMH > 100M | 10 | 2019-09-25 17:19 |
| Reserving 800M to 890M to 63 bits. | chalsall | LMH > 100M | 12 | 2010-01-31 09:57 |