![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
Oct 2002
Lost in the hills of Iowa
1C016 Posts |
I see no reason "your" 700Mhz Celery can't do first time checks.
I've got a couple Celery-500 range machines - including both my dualy Celeries on one or both CPUs - doing first-time checks on 30M+ range factors. They will take a couple years at the rate they're going, but shouldn't slow the project as a whole down at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Aug 2002
2×32×13×37 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Oct 2003
Croatia
45610 Posts |
Double checking seems better assignment for that machine, especialy as it can be replaced in a few months. This way I don't have to worry about saving save files. I can just set it up and leave it to run until they replace this machine.
If it would be my private machine (I would have more contro lover it) I would probably run first time tests. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Celeron 2.40 too slow? | rudi_m | Hardware | 14 | 2005-10-11 03:31 |
| Celeron D; The new Prime95 CPU of choice? | E_tron | Hardware | 17 | 2005-01-27 02:49 |
| New celeron. look, look! | E_tron | Hardware | 5 | 2004-07-13 05:16 |
| Benchmark: P4 and P4 Celeron | E_tron | Hardware | 3 | 2003-11-20 18:31 |
| Celeron vs. P4 | PrimeCruncher | Hardware | 7 | 2003-11-14 02:19 |