|
2003-11-19, 01:30
|
#1 |
Sep 2003
2×5×7×37 Posts |
5.98M to 6.0M: redoing factoring to 62 bits
Some exponents in the 5.98M to 6.0M range were not properly factored to 62 bits. Following up on dswanson and garo's suggestions, I have just found 3 new factors of 53 bits in this range.
See this post: http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthr...4091#post14091 and its accompanying thread and graph. If you want to help re-factor these to 62 bits, check out the Marin's Mersenne-aries subforum They are split up into sets of 50-100 for quick turnover. Note: all of these exponents have already been LL-tested and verified twice, so strictly speaking this doesn't advance GIMPS. |
|
|
 |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Coordination thread for redoing P-1 factoring | ixfd64 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 84 | 2021-12-21 23:36 |
| Redoing factoring work done by unreliable machines | tha | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 23 | 2016-11-02 08:51 |
| CUDALucas not redoing iterations with larger FFT | patrik | GPU Computing | 2 | 2014-09-12 00:56 |
| Redoing work? | MooMoo2 | Riesel Prime Search | 2 | 2010-09-15 17:33 |
| P-1: poorly P-1'd exponents that need redoing | James Heinrich | Marin's Mersenne-aries | 54 | 2008-04-07 20:27 |
