![]() |
|
|
#386 |
|
Jan 2006
Hungary
4148 Posts |
I've reached the end of my reservation for Riesel 19 at n = 30,000. I won't continue with the bulk, but I am taking k = 366 to 200,000. Currently it is at 140,000.
Willem. |
|
|
|
|
|
#387 |
|
Jan 2006
Hungary
22·67 Posts |
Here are the primes that I found for base 7. I've confirmed them with PFGW as well.
257318*7^63295-1 747176*7^60757-1 48584*7^56816-1 493032*7^51053-1 184434*7^46243-1 913284*7^45093-1 The search has progressed until k = 67,000 Willem. |
|
|
|
|
|
#388 | |
|
Jan 2006
Hungary
22·67 Posts |
Quote:
Willem. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#389 |
|
Jan 2005
47910 Posts |
Riesel base 24is now at n=32,5
Sierpinski base 24 is now at n=33,9 Unfortunately I had too little time at the comp. to assess how many k's remain, but next time I'll update that too :) It appears as though I won't get to 100k any time soon... |
|
|
|
|
|
#390 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
242438 Posts |
I have restarted Sierp base 12 k=404 and it is now at n=180K; no primes.
Continuing to n=200K, then will pause for a while to sieve further before continuing up to n=250K. |
|
|
|
|
|
#391 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101·103 Posts |
Sierp base 12 k=404 is at n=190K. Nothing to report. Continuing on...
Testing time jumped by ~30% from 3220 secs. to 4225 secs. at n=187.6K. (bleh!) Whew, these higher bases take a long time just to get to n=200K for a single k! Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#392 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
242438 Posts |
Quote:
On your ranges complete, I can't update anything on the web pages for base 24 without a # of k's remaining at the limits specified. For example on the Riesel side, it would be inaccurate to show the # of k's remaining at n=25K with a search limit of n=32.5K. If you can do a quick count on your k's remaining at these limits, I'll go ahead and update both the ranges and k's remaining. Thanks, Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#393 |
|
Quasi Admin Thing
May 2005
2×3×7×23 Posts |
I'll now start the process of keeping at least some of my old promises, so for now, I'll reserve Sierp base 19 to n<=25K, and I'll do it this way:
1. PRP test up to n<=25K 2. Verify PRP tests 3. Remove k's from sievefile, and then maybe continue upwards towards n<=50K once further sieving has been added. KEP! |
|
|
|
|
|
#394 |
|
Jan 2005
1DF16 Posts |
Riesel base 31 is now at 90.8k, no additional primes to report.
Continuing... |
|
|
|
|
|
#395 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101·103 Posts |
Quote:
Micha, I didn't know if you saw the above post so I thought I'd repost it. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#396 |
|
Jan 2005
479 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Riesel base 3 reservations/statuses/primes | KEP | Conjectures 'R Us | 1107 | 2021-07-26 18:37 |
| Bases 501-1030 reservations/statuses/primes | KEP | Conjectures 'R Us | 3913 | 2021-07-26 09:58 |
| Bases 251-500 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 2300 | 2021-07-25 07:38 |
| Bases 101-250 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 905 | 2021-07-18 16:55 |
| Bases 33-100 reservations/statuses/primes | Siemelink | Conjectures 'R Us | 1691 | 2021-07-06 18:50 |