Sierp base 6 - team drive #3

[mdettweiler]

New files for n>100K are all ready and will be posted soon.

In the meantime, reserving 100K-120K for LLRnet port 6.

[mdettweiler]

80K-100K completed by LLRnet IB6, lresults attached.

[mdettweiler]

New files posted for 120K-125K. Come and get 'em!

Note: due to the increased testing times at these higher n-levels, we have dropped the file sizes to n=500 (.5K) apiece.

[mdettweiler]

Reserving 120K-130K for LLRnet port 6.

[gd_barnes]

Some way or another this got missed in the base 6 server from June 1st:

user=Beyond_Free-DC
[06/01/08 05:18:48]
72785*6^118347+1 is prime! Time : 1050.0 sec.


At 92097 digits, it's just a little short of top-5000.


Gary

[gd_barnes]

Anon and Ironbits,

Can you pull n=120K-130K out of port 6 and remove k=72785 and then feed it back in? At this high of an n-value, it will save significant CPU time for an n=10K range. With no work in 3 weeks on the server and us currently at n=118.7K, it shouldn't create a problem.

I figure that leaving k=72785 in the server file up to n=120K is a small price to pay to make the n=100K-120K results file easy to match up with the original sieved file.


Gary

[mdettweiler]

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

Anon and Ironbits,

Can you pull n=120K-130K out of port 6 and remove k=72785 and then feed it back in? At this high of an n-value, it will save significant CPU time for an n=10K range. With no work in 3 weeks on the server and us currently at n=118.7K, it shouldn't create a problem.

I figure that leaving k=72785 in the server file up to n=120K is a small price to pay to make the n=100K-120K results file easy to match up with the original sieved file.


Gary

Okay, I guess that would work, since testing hasn't reached that level yet. IronBits, I'll send you knpairs for 120K-130K with the k removed shortly; then you can remove 120K-130K from the server, and add in the new 120K-130K.

[IronBits]

Done, however, I noticed it's missing that 1st line with all them 000000000000000 in it.
Not sure if hurts anything, but the old one is out, the new one is in.

[mdettweiler]

Originally Posted by IronBits

Done, however, I noticed it's missing that 1st line with all them 000000000000000 in it.
Not sure if hurts anything, but the old one is out, the new one is in.

Uh...I hope you didn't remove the entire old file, just the stuff for n>120K. The new file has only 120K-130K (when the old file had some stuff left below 120K, which should be left intact). That's why I left out the header line, just like I do for "refill" files--I figured since you wouldn't be taking out the whole file, just the stuff from a certain point on, the original header line wouldn't be removed at all.

The header line is a necessary component--without it, the server will have no idea what base, Sierpinski/Riesel, or whatever, those specific k and n values are supposed to fit into. Whether or not you'll have to re-add it will depend entirely on whether you removed the entire file or just the >120K part.

[IronBits]

bangs head. I'll go see what I can figure out. Hope I did it correctly.
stopped server
I looked at the 1st line in the new file you sent, searched for that line in the knpairs.txt
deleted that line and everything below to EOF.
cat newfile.txt >> knpairs.txt
restarted server.

[mdettweiler]

Originally Posted by IronBits

bangs head. I'll go see what I can figure out. Hope I did it correctly.
stopped server
I looked at the 1st line in the new file you sent, searched for that line in the knpairs.txt
deleted that line and everything below to EOF.
cat newfile.txt >> knpairs.txt
restarted server.

Okay, you're good then.