![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Where will the next mersenne be found? | |||
| Below M44, < 32,582,657 |
|
1 | 2.17% |
| Between 32,582,657 and 43,000,000 |
|
8 | 17.39% |
| Between 43,000,001 and 56,000,000 |
|
21 | 45.65% |
| Between 56,000,001 and 79,300,000 |
|
11 | 23.91% |
| Above 79,300,000 |
|
5 | 10.87% |
| Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#23 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
10110111110012 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Nov 2004
22×33×5 Posts |
Quote:
Norm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
11001010010102 Posts |
Quote:
the average over GIMPS 11 years of life. As GIMPS computing clout increases, so does the computing needed per test. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
5,881 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
97·101 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
145128 Posts |
Quote:
my comments on the result of the poll. The probability of no more primes in the first range is very high. The probability of no primes between 32M and 43M is >80% The probability of no primes between 43M and 56M is ~50% The probability of no primes between 56M and 79M is ~40% Tests are performed in ascending order. David Last fiddled with by davieddy on 2008-06-08 at 10:55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Aug 2003
Snicker, AL
3BF16 Posts |
Translating, there should be 1.3 primes from now until we reach 79M. Something about that does NOT ring true to me. From recent history, I would think there were either 2 or 3 primes to be found in that range.
DarJones |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
Quoting from the GIMPS home page, we expect 1.78 primes
between exponents x and 2x, so GIMPS has been on a very lucky streak for the last five primes. The formula used to estimate the expected primes between exponents e1 and e2 is 2.57*ln(e2/e1). This tallies with the values that used to be found on the old colourful GIMPS status page (which some of us miss sorely) David BTW I assume you naively added 0.2 + 0.5 + 0.6 to get 1.3 Last fiddled with by davieddy on 2008-06-08 at 23:53 |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2·3·13·83 Posts |
Before LLtesting, we expect 1.78 primes with
exponents between 40M and 80M. The "Poisson distribution" tells us that the probability of no primes in this range is~17%. This tallies with my figures above: 0.8*0.5*0.4 = 0.16 Note that the expected number of primes is not 1 - 0.17. That gives us the probability of one OR MORE primes. David NB we have tested exponents up to 2^25 25*1.78 = 44.5 Last fiddled with by davieddy on 2008-06-09 at 10:35 |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
It is remarkable how well the % poll results reflect
the actual probabilities for each range. David |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stockfish game, move 11 poll. Not "Trump vs Clinton" poll. | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-11-07 06:07 |
| Age poll | Oddball | Lounge | 7 | 2010-08-22 21:02 |
| Where is 'M45'? - poll #2 | Uncwilly | Lounge | 20 | 2009-01-27 19:23 |
| Where is 'M45'? - poll #4 | Uncwilly | Lounge | 3 | 2008-08-23 20:29 |
| Where is 'M45'? - poll #3 | Uncwilly | Lounge | 10 | 2008-06-22 05:32 |