mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2008-04-24, 15:04   #34
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

4,691 Posts
Default

http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm

Strictly based on the statistics on the above link each core could theoretically finish 42,000,000 in 30 days. IF it can run 24 hours a day with nothing much else taking CPU time.

However, based on previous posts in this forum and other related hardware/benchmark forums you will NOT get 100% throughput on each core if all 4 are running primenet.
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-04-24, 15:58   #35
Housemouse
 
Housemouse's Avatar
 
Feb 2008

408 Posts
Default

How much would performance increase with a Q9450 and DDR3 memory?
Any idea in cost increase?
Housemouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-04-24, 22:56   #36
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

11·311 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by petrw1 View Post
However, based on previous posts in this forum and other related hardware/benchmark forums you will NOT get 100% throughput on each core if all 4 are running primenet.
For a Core2Quad with DDR2-800 you can expect an overall throughput with 4 cores of somewhere around 2.8x throughput of a single core. Based on some rough benchmarks I took yesterday, a Q9x50 series with fast DDR3 could be ~20% faster with 3 or 4 threads than a Q6600, so you should get at least 3 exponents processed per month, maybe a little more.
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-04-25, 09:40   #37
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

2·47·101 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
For a Core2Quad with DDR2-800 you can expect an overall throughput with 4 cores of somewhere around 2.8x throughput of a single core.
Timed my Q6600 (@3200MHz) with DDR2-1066 (set FSB multiplier to 3:2):
For the popular 2048M FFT range (under 39.5M) range for a point of reference -
1 LL thread - 0.036s/iter
2 LL threads scale to 1.95x of a single core (0.037s/iter if you get the right pair of cores)
3 LL threads scale to 2.66x of a single core (0.042s/iter on a pair and 0.037s/iter on a one = 0.0405s/iter harmonic mean)
4 LL threads scale to 3.16x of a single core (0.0455s/iter)

The dual quad core at work scales much worse: all 8 threads (8 LLs) produce less work than 7 LLs. Sad, but true. So I run 7 LLs. (but this, combined, is still better than 6, 5, ..., 1) You have to use harmonic means of iteration timings reported in threads (obviously).

DDR2-1066 don't break the bank. Do DDR3 if you are rich.

Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2008-04-25 at 09:46 Reason: harmonic mean (subcontrary!)
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-04-25, 18:52   #38
rx7350
 
rx7350's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
AR, US

24·32 Posts
Default

Please post your detailed system components list. It would be helpful if you would also post your overclocking settings in BIOS.

I'm interested in adding to my P95 farm, and the iteration times when running four LL tests looks quite good.
rx7350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-04-26, 01:22   #39
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

949410 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rx7350 View Post
Please post your detailed system components list. It would be helpful if you would also post your overclocking settings in BIOS.

I'm interested in adding to my P95 farm, and the iteration times when running four LL tests looks quite good.
Sure, too easy (as the Australians say) - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=339536

I believed in these principles -
1) weird multiplers (like 8:5 or 5:3) are not really working for memory, and
2) "thou shall not touch your memory's frequency" (the vendor OC'd it for you already! Especially if their name is Corsair)
=> so I had only two or three FSB frequencies to test.
266 x 4.000 = 1066MHz (original) 266 x 9 = 2400MHz (CPU)
320 x 3.333 = 1066MHz
333 x 3.200 = 1066MHz
355 x 3.000 = 1065Mhz

I liked the last one the best. The above timings are from this configuration.
In BIOS you need to know the Ctrl-F1 combination (it's not secret, it's in TFM) - and see the attached snapshot.

P.S. Memory shows in BIOS as DDR2-800 but it is sold by Corsair as XMS-1066
The parts list (built in December) -
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819115017
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813128059
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16811129021
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16817153039
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820145043 and an HD and a video card

Added in March after getting addicted to GIMPS -
http://www.newegg.com/product/produc...82E16835154001 (very important, without it I had Tj=70C+ under the 4 LLs @2400MHz; now I have 60C under the 4 LLs @3200MHz) there are other good coolers too. But this one is the king.

P.P.S. And now is not December - it's time to buy Q9450 (or Q9300 at least) instead of Q6600.
Maybe there's a DDR2-1111 or 1200 choice already, as well. Up a notch everything, of course.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	oc3.gif
Views:	137
Size:	125.8 KB
ID:	2424  

Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2008-04-26 at 01:58 Reason: added about memory
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-07-11, 13:38   #40
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

26×131 Posts
Default

what would be really cool is if prime95 let you use readyboost as far as I know you can't if I could I'd be 5 times as fast lol.
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camera advice xilman Astronomy 12 2018-04-16 20:10
Advice for PSU em99010pepe Hardware 1 2010-01-31 23:48
Advice for NFS LA system Jeff Gilchrist Hardware 5 2010-01-30 13:27
P95 newbie looking for advice francais Hardware 2 2008-04-23 01:01
New LMH needs advice. M0CZY Lone Mersenne Hunters 2 2005-05-24 20:05

All times are UTC. The time now is 02:37.


Mon Aug 2 02:37:07 UTC 2021 up 9 days, 21:06, 0 users, load averages: 1.31, 1.63, 1.84

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.