![]() |
|
|
#199 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#200 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
29×359 Posts |
Quote:
He told me he'd just take everything up to n=600K himself in the next few months and that the rest of the team should start sieving and testing n>600K. I had to agree. It'd be easiest that way. So I've set a new goal to get everything tested to n=1M by the spring of 2009. Then we can sieve and test all of RPS's k's to n=1M too by the end of 2009 followed by testing k=1000-2000 to n=600K late in 2010. Gotta keep pushin'! ![]() He meant 200,000 k/n pairs. That's typically what he's requested from me.It's all top-5000 work now. I'm thinking ~50-50 split or ~100,000 k/n pairs on both drives 1 and 3. That will put drive 3 way ahead of drive 1 on the n-testing range due to less k's. This will give people a better variety of the n-range that they can choose to test. Also, if we can get it up to n=480K, we can open up even more k's to testing above n=600K. There are quite a few k's that were previously tested from 480K-600K with a gap below the range that we're filling in. Those additional k's would be in addition to the 7 k's that can be started right away after I'm done sieving n=600K-1M April 1st that have previously been tested to 600K with no gaps. The only caveat here is that I'd like to not wipe out too much of drive 3. I still want to spread things around some so I may tweak the percentage a little depending on where it puts him on testing. Sound reasonable? IronBits, I've exclusively been on drive 1 for quite a while now attempting to get the gap filled up to n=400K below Beyond's finished 400K-410K range. It's getting close now. Within the next few days, I'll shift at least 2 of my 4 LLRnet cores from Adam's drive 1 server to your drive 3 server. And after the 3 cores are done with my manual reservations there within a week, I'll shift at least 2 of them over for a total of 4. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-03-28 at 08:36 |
|
|
|
|
|
#201 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
Ah, I get it now.
|
|
|
|
|
#202 |
|
Dec 2002
22×3×37 Posts |
If possible I need to delay the new ranges for 1 week.
|
|
|
|
|
#203 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
29·359 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#204 |
|
Dec 2002
1101111002 Posts |
Sounds like a plan
|
|
|
|
|
#205 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
29×359 Posts |
394.8-395.0 complete; no primes
|
|
|
|
|
#206 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
242538 Posts |
Reserving 412.0-415.0 for the port 300 server.
|
|
|
|
|
#207 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
102538 Posts |
Taking 410.2-410.4
|
|
|
|
|
#208 |
|
Sep 2005
Raleigh, North Carolina
337 Posts |
410.0 410.2 Complete No Primes
|
|
|
|
|
#209 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
395.0K-400.0K completed by LLRnet AES300. lresults will be emailed to Gary shortly.
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team drive #14: k=600-1001 n=1M-2M | mdettweiler | No Prime Left Behind | 10 | 2021-03-13 22:32 |
| Team drive #7 k=800-1001 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 127 | 2011-07-15 14:25 |
| Team drive #6 k=600-800 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 89 | 2011-03-10 12:34 |
| Team drive #5: k=400-600 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 135 | 2010-11-23 14:27 |
| Team drive #4, 15 k's < 300 for n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 38 | 2008-10-22 16:20 |