|
2003-10-22, 11:21
|
#12 |
"Mike"
Aug 2002
2·23·179 Posts |
That was a PERFECT explanation!
 (I haven't seen any performance drop running 1 instance of Prime95 on a HT CPU... No program is 100% optimised so there are always a few cycles left over... I figure those few extra cycles can be put to use for general OS usage so the main Prime95 instance continues to run 100%!) |
|
|
|
2003-10-22, 13:59
|
#13 |
|
Feb 2003
32 Posts |
Great email, explains it well.
Turned HT off and my iteration times change slightly, from 0.051 to 0.050 (Sorry about the question, i thought I had already turned HT off after reading the previous answers) Jim |
|
|
|
|
2003-10-22, 22:50
|
#14 |
Jun 2003
The Computer
1100010002 Posts |
Maybe you could use affinity or something on hyperthreading. I don't know much about it but it seems kinda like dual processor.
|
|
|
|
 |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Iteration times in i5 and i7 | Jud McCranie | Information & Answers | 53 | 2013-08-17 19:09 |
| What are your per-iteration times? | LiquidNitrogen | Hardware | 22 | 2011-07-12 23:15 |
| Iteration times slow compared to benchmark | cd1940 | Software | 4 | 2004-07-05 17:55 |
| LLR.exe FFT crossovers and iteration times | SlashDude | 15k Search | 0 | 2004-01-28 05:47 |
| slow iteration times | PLeopard | Hardware | 9 | 2003-10-29 05:48 |
