![]() |
|
|
#23 |
|
Aug 2003
Upstate NY, USA
1010001102 Posts |
update details:
"laptop" took 1925 exponents from 62 bits brought 1864 of them to 64 bits found factors for the other 61 "home-old" took 848 exponents from 62 bits brought 838 of them to 63 bits found factors for the other 10 avg bit depth increased from 62.764 to 62.957 fewer than 10,000 exponents remaining at 62bits in this range |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Aug 2003
Upstate NY, USA
2×163 Posts |
well it's been 7 months (minus 1 day), so update time
since May 31st, 212 exponents now have a factor found The avg bit depth of the remaining 23778 exponents has increased from 62.957 to 63.575 all numbers above are after results sent to George this week and should be reflected in the next nofactor -Tom EDIT: 69.000 to 69.001M are released at 72 bits for anyone so interested Last fiddled with by tom11784 on 2005-12-30 at 14:33 |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Aug 2003
Upstate NY, USA
2×163 Posts |
hi all - i'm still alive
i submitted an update to George and it should be in the next nofactor 114 new factors found average bit depth raised from 63.575 to 63.826 with less than 1000 exponents left at 62 bits will stop back in now and then... |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
24×173 Posts |
thanks for the update.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Aug 2003
Upstate NY, USA
2×163 Posts |
time for a long overdue update:
just e-mailed my results from the last *gasp* 20 months to George, so hopefully they'll make the next nofactor details: factor(s) found for 297 candidates have all others to 63+ bits 192 @ 63, 11357 @ 64, 11167 @ 65, 84 @ 66, 544 @ 68 1 @ 71 (done by someone else), 22 @ 72 |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
3·23·89 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Aug 2003
Upstate NY, USA
2×163 Posts |
64.5778
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to retire one core in a dual-core CPU? | Rodrigo | PrimeNet | 4 | 2011-07-30 14:43 |
| Need to Retire an Old Box | Hywelbane | Hardware | 2 | 2005-09-11 20:12 |