Rejected k/n pairs - Page 2

kar_bon · 2008-02-10, 11:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

Karsten,

What about adding a column at the score table for double-check pairs?

Carlos

i checked not the residues yet, only k-/n-values and date/time.

and how about the scoring for double checks? number of k/n-pairs too?

to maintain doublechecks too, we had to mark them separately and offer testfiles with non-doublecked pairs to avoid triple checks.
i think these will be to only doubles here so i suggest to make a special not there, no new column please!

karsten

IronBits · 2008-02-26, 07:55

I have a lot of entries in rejected on my personal proxy...

mdettweiler · 2008-02-26, 07:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by IronBits

I have a lot of entries in rejected on my personal proxy...

Are you saying that the rejected.txt file showed up on your LLRnet server containing lots of results from your proxy, or that the rejected.txt file showed up in your proxy's folder?

em99010pepe · 2008-02-26, 08:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by IronBits

I have a lot of entries in rejected on my personal proxy...

Don't worry about rejected ones, they will be re-assigned again.

IronBits · 2008-02-26, 08:46

But it is over 1 meg in size and the only ones working them were my two quads.
Why would there be so many rejected from just 8 cores on my own lan?
[02/23/08 23:33:14] first entry
[02/24/08 07:03:06] last entry
seems like a lot of wasted time and effort...

em99010pepe · 2008-02-26, 08:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by IronBits

But it is over 1 meg in size and the only ones working them were my two quads.
Why would there be so many rejected from just 8 cores on my own lan?
[02/23/08 23:33:14] first entry
[02/24/08 07:03:06] last entry
seems like a lot of wasted time and effort...

Because your are making double or "octo" work, your lan or proxy is not well set.

IronBits · 2008-02-26, 09:21

Ok, just trying to understand. As soon as it finishes up, I'll stop my personal and switch to my public server.
I see Mr. Sheep is having his way with my public server right now.

em99010pepe · 2008-12-06, 12:50

Update.

- You will get a bunch of rejected pairs if you connect to another llrnet without deleting the workfile.txt and z**** files.

Carlos

2008-02-26, 08:46	#16
IronBits I ♥ BOINC! Oct 2002 Glendale, AZ. (USA) 3×7×53 Posts	But it is over 1 meg in size and the only ones working them were my two quads. Why would there be so many rejected from just 8 cores on my own lan? [02/23/08 23:33:14] first entry [02/24/08 07:03:06] last entry seems like a lot of wasted time and effort... Last fiddled with by IronBits on 2008-02-26 at 08:48

2008-02-26, 09:21	#18
IronBits I ♥ BOINC! Oct 2002 Glendale, AZ. (USA) 2131₈ Posts	Ok, just trying to understand. As soon as it finishes up, I'll stop my personal and switch to my public server. I see Mr. Sheep is having his way with my public server right now. Last fiddled with by IronBits on 2008-02-26 at 09:22

2008-12-06, 12:50	#19
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2×5×283 Posts	Update. - You will get a bunch of rejected pairs if you connect to another llrnet without deleting the workfile.txt and z**** files. Carlos Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2008-12-06 at 12:59

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Search for all amicable pairs up to 2^64	Sergei Chernykh	Aliquot Sequences	37	2018-01-27 19:23
Why was this rejected?	petrw1	PrimeNet	2	2015-10-01 17:11
GPU LL result rejected	mdettweiler	PrimeNet	4	2010-10-04 20:03
Tony Reix, I'm feeling rejected :)	Prime95	Lounge	2	2007-02-26 08:05
Double-checks come in pairs?	BigRed	Software	1	2002-10-20 05:29