![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
141518 Posts |
Hi all,
A while back, Gary asked me to coordinate some doublechecking for the range 100K<n<260K for the NPLB range of k's (300<k<1001). I've started the sieving and taken it to p=10G, but since Gary estimates optimal depth at p=550G, it is way more than I can handle, with only one machine that isn't on 24/7. So, I've decided to open it up to the members of the NPLB project. This will serve as a reservation/status thread for the effort; to claim a range, simply post a reply and specify what range you're taking. Reservations of all sizes are welcome--feel free to take whatever you feel you can complete in a reasonable amount of time. (Please give status reports at least every two weeks, preferably more frequently). ![]() Update: We have now expanded this sieving effort to include k<300 (for the same n-range). Chris (Flatlander) and I (Anonymous) started the sieve for k<300, and got it caught up to this one (at p=130G). I've now combined the two sieve files; thus, any reservations past 130G will be for the combined sieve file. (I've updated the link below to point to the new combined sieve file.) The sieve file can be downloaded here. It contains one file, "sr2data.txt", which is our sieve file. Extract it to the folder containing your copy of sr2sieve (if you don't have the latest version already, get it here). Then, make a new text file called "sr2work.txt". Open it in a text editor, and enter your range on the first line, like in this example (for 10G-20G): Code:
10-20 When your range is done, email the factors.txt file to me at bugmesticky@googlemail.com. Then, report the range as complete here in this thread, and, if you wish, reserve another range and start the process over again! ![]() Status of reserved ranges: Code:
Range Reserved by Status ---------------------------------- 550G-600G gd_barnes complete 310G-550G (various)* complete 300G-310G gd_barnes complete 270G-300G Kman1293 complete 130G-270G Flatlander complete ----sieve file combined w/k<300 here---- 120G-130G Anonymous complete 80G-120G Flatlander complete 70G-80G Anonymous complete 50G-70G Flatlander complete 30G-50G AES complete 20G-30G Flatlander complete 10G-20G Anonymous complete 0-10G Anonymous complete Sieving is complete! Thanks to all who helped out! If you'd like to help out with the LLRing please see the Doublecheck Drive #1 thread. ![]() Let's get rolling!
Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2008-03-28 at 05:09 |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
624910 Posts |
I'll take 10G-20G to get us started.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
40358 Posts |
How long do you estimate a 10G range would take on a single 3GHz C2D core?
If I reboot the machine will it find its place and continue? |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
Quote:
Yes, it will remember its place. Simply press Ctrl-C to interrupt srsieve before you shut your computer down, and then when you start back up, just run the batch file/shell script again. srsieve will read from the checkpoint.txt file that it's saved (it saves it every five minutes, so even if your computer is shut down abruptly, it will still not lose much work), and pick up from there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
31×67 Posts |
I'll take 20G-30G.
Do I need the "...i686" srsieve? (XP 32 bit, C2D) Last fiddled with by Flatlander on 2008-02-16 at 18:26 |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Thanks for helping out!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
31·67 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
31×67 Posts |
Just on one core at 3013MHz.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
Okay. I'm using a 2.2Ghz Core 2 Duo, so it shouldn't take too much longer. Looks like my estimate of 2-3 days of CPU time was a little off--but I'm not complaining, since it should actually take less time than that.
Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2008-02-16 at 19:59 Reason: typo |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Jul 2007
Tennessee
25×19 Posts |
Is there a reason you're not using sr2sieve?
I'll take 30e9 to 50e9 Last fiddled with by AES on 2008-02-17 at 00:27 |
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is more sieving power needed? | jasong | jasong | 4 | 2012-03-25 19:11 |
| Doublecheck always have shifted S0 value? | ATH | PrimeNet | 11 | 2010-06-03 06:38 |
| All things doublecheck!! | masser | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 44 | 2006-09-24 17:19 |
| DoubleCheck vs LL assignments | Unregistered | PrimeNet | 9 | 2006-03-26 05:48 |
| doublecheck - results | TheJudger | Data | 4 | 2005-04-04 08:54 |