24 hour rally - Page 4

ET_ · 2008-02-08, 19:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

Just a quick note, in the last 24 hours the server received more than 11 000 k/n pairs with 5 primes found or checked.

Does it require too much bandwith?

Luigi

em99010pepe · 2008-02-08, 20:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by ET_

Does it require too much bandwith?

Luigi

I am not controlling that. My bandwidth limit is 60GB per month and so far I spent 4GB with a few downloads.

BlisteringSheep · 2008-02-08, 20:06

3 cores

2.5 GHz P4 (Northwood), Linux, about .56-.70 ms/it
3.2 GHz P4 (Nocona 640), Win32, about 1.0-1.8 ms/it (2nd virtual core is doing desktop stuff)
3.06 GHz P4 (Northwood), Win32, expect about 0.48 ms/it (2nd virtual core is currently BOINC, will be mostly idle in a few hours)

Is there a recommended WUCacheSize setting to reduce overhead given how quick these process? I'd like to keep the duty cycle up while not hogging tests.

ET_ · 2008-02-08, 20:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlisteringSheep

Is there a recommended WUCacheSize setting to reduce overhead given how quick these process? I'd like to keep the duty cycle up while not hogging tests.

Good question. I suffer from sudden drops of line...

Heck, even with the maximum WUcache allowed of 100, I should set an alarm each 4-5 hours of sleep...

Luigi

em99010pepe · 2008-02-08, 20:26

Set the cache wu to 20...

ET_ · 2008-02-08, 20:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

Set the cache wu to 20...

Should we stop/pause the client, or just modify the config file while running?

Luigi

(Sometimes I feel like I speak too much...)

em99010pepe · 2008-02-08, 20:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by ET_

Should we stop/pause the client, or just modify the config file while running?

Luigi

(Sometimes I feel like I speak too much...)

Stop the client.

ET_ · 2008-02-08, 20:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

Stop the client.

Done.

Just tell me when I can start it again...

Luigi

em99010pepe · 2008-02-08, 20:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by ET_

Done.

Just tell me when I can start it again...

Luigi

After renaming your username to Free-DC_em99010pepe.

BlisteringSheep · 2008-02-08, 20:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlisteringSheep

3 cores

2.5 GHz P4 (Northwood), Linux, about .56-.70 ms/it
3.2 GHz P4 (Nocona 640), Win32, about 1.0-1.8 ms/it (2nd virtual core is doing desktop stuff)
3.06 GHz P4 (Northwood), Win32, expect about 0.48 ms/it (2nd virtual core is currently BOINC, will be mostly idle in a few hours)

Is there a recommended WUCacheSize setting to reduce overhead given how quick these process? I'd like to keep the duty cycle up while not hogging tests.

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

Set the cache wu to 20...

Great! And binding the llrnet to the physical core instead of the virtual core that's doing other junk sped up #2 above...

BlisteringSheep · 2008-02-08, 20:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

After renaming your username to Free-DC_em99010pepe.

Oops, forgot that step.

2008-02-08, 20:06	#36
BlisteringSheep Oct 2006 On a Suzuki Boulevard C90 2×3×41 Posts	3 cores 2.5 GHz P4 (Northwood), Linux, about .56-.70 ms/it 3.2 GHz P4 (Nocona 640), Win32, about 1.0-1.8 ms/it (2nd virtual core is doing desktop stuff) 3.06 GHz P4 (Northwood), Win32, expect about 0.48 ms/it (2nd virtual core is currently BOINC, will be mostly idle in a few hours) Is there a recommended WUCacheSize setting to reduce overhead given how quick these process? I'd like to keep the duty cycle up while not hogging tests.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
24 hour news	davieddy	Soap Box	4	2011-12-19 19:35
mfaktc slows on WinXP after about an hour	Christenson	GPU Computing	5	2011-05-27 21:47
Prime 95 shuts down itself after exactly 9:22 hour	Unregistered	Information & Answers	13	2009-09-02 05:11
! hour limit on editing	davieddy	Lounge	7	2009-09-01 15:57
1 buck an hour	crash893	Hardware	6	2009-06-18 01:45

2008-02-08, 20:26	#38
em99010pepe Sep 2004 5416₈ Posts	Set the cache wu to 20...