![]() |
|
|
#199 | |
|
Jan 2005
1110111112 Posts |
24 mini-successes for Riesel base 24:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#200 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Riesel Base 30 k=25 sieved to p=600G for range n=25K-100K, releasing. Sieve file attached.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#201 |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
5·7·83 Posts |
after found prime 40657*6^39087-1:
16 candidates to go. - k=1597 at 155k - k=9577 at 58k - other 14 k at 39.3k |
|
|
|
|
|
#202 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
11000011010012 Posts |
Reserving Riesel base 28 k=4322, 4436, and 4871 up to n=25K (currently all at n=5K).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#203 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Only hours after I reserve three Riesel Base 28 k's, and I find a probable prime waiting in my lresults file!
![]() Here it is: 4436*28^6242-1 is prime! (Found probable prime by LLR, proved prime with Proth.exe. I would have used PFGW, but I'm using Linux, and I don't have the PFGW linux program--too lazy to register for Yahoo Groups to download it--and it wouldn't work in Wine (the program that lets you run most Windows programs on Linux), whereas Proth.exe does. So I just used Proth.exe, which was fine anyway for a small number like this.) My second prime so far! ![]() Note: I didn't notice the prime in my lresults file until more than an hour after it was found, so I ended up searching k=4436 up to n=13930. I'm continuing to work on the remaining two reserved k's, both at about n=14.3K.
Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2008-01-28 at 23:42 |
|
|
|
|
|
#204 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Riesel base 28 k=4322 and 4871 completed up to n=25K, releasing. Prime found on k=4436 (already reported in the "report primes here" thread); k=4436 ended up being tested to n=13930 because I didn't notice the prime until about an hour after it was found.
lresults for the three k's are attached.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#205 |
|
"Erling B."
Dec 2005
1308 Posts |
Completed n to 170k. No prime. I will send the results to gd_barnes when n =200k.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#206 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101·103 Posts |
Thanks for info. Japelprime. That's a lot of testing!
![]() Meanwhile...Carlos has unreserved Sierp base 12 k=404 that was tested to n=88.5K. I have put a sieved file to n=100K on the Sierp reservations web page if anyone is interested in 'cleaning' it. ![]() Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#207 |
|
Sep 2004
2·5·283 Posts |
Oops...it's done up to n=96.970k.
Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2008-02-01 at 20:28 |
|
|
|
|
|
#208 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101·103 Posts |
OK, 82 tests to go. I'll reserve it and take it up to n=100K.
Were you running this on a slower machine? A preliminary test at n=97K on my 1.66 Ghz Dell core duo laptop shows ~3.35 ms per pit * 347758 bits = ~1182 secs. testing time vs. your 2200+ secs. So this should take me about 27-28 CPU hours to complete it. Maybe my machine is faster at non-powers-of-2 bases. ![]() Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#209 |
|
Jan 2006
Hungary
22×67 Posts |
2319*28^65184-1 is a probable prime. Time: 894.036 sec.
Please credit George Woltman's PRP for this result! Testing with pfgw at the moment. Willem. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Riesel base 3 reservations/statuses/primes | KEP | Conjectures 'R Us | 1107 | 2021-07-26 18:37 |
| Bases 501-1030 reservations/statuses/primes | KEP | Conjectures 'R Us | 3913 | 2021-07-26 09:58 |
| Bases 251-500 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 2300 | 2021-07-25 07:38 |
| Bases 101-250 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 905 | 2021-07-18 16:55 |
| Bases 33-100 reservations/statuses/primes | Siemelink | Conjectures 'R Us | 1691 | 2021-07-06 18:50 |