Opinions on team drive #3

gd_barnes · 2008-01-22, 03:31

I would like to start a team drive for a base that is not a multiple of 2. Can people give me their opinions on which one would be good?

I personally like Sierp base 6 right now. Not too many k's remaining (56), not too few, base isn't terribly high, etc. We'd probably put about 48-50 k's in the team drive.

When we agree on a good base, I'll start and/or coordinate some sieving on it.

Thanks,
Gary

mdettweiler · 2008-01-22, 04:35

I agree! Sierp. Base 6 looks excellent for the next team drive. It PRP's at a decent speed because it's such a relatively low base, so it's one of the more attractive non-power-of-2 bases.

gd_barnes · 2008-01-23, 21:15

We are going to start a drive #3 for Sierp base 6 when I'm done sieving n=30K-100K for all k's except those already sieved. I started sieving yesterday. We will include all k's except about 8-10 of them for individual reservations. I'll post separate sieved files on those.

Gary

mdettweiler · 2008-01-23, 21:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

We are going to start a drive #3 for Sierp base 6 when I'm done sieving n=30K-100K for all k's except those already sieved. I started sieving yesterday. We will include all k's except about 8-10 of them for individual reservations. I'll post separate sieved files on those.

Gary

When's your estimated ETA for the sieved files?

Since it's now official that Sierp. base 6 will be Drive #3, I'll see about having Carlos set up a third LLRnet server for the it. Maybe, for the purposes of getting it set up, we could have LLRnet work on the sieve files for the 3 k's that are already sieved, at first?

gd_barnes · 2008-01-23, 23:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous

When's your estimated ETA for the sieved files?

Since it's now official that Sierp. base 6 will be Drive #3, I'll see about having Carlos set up a third LLRnet server for the it. Maybe, for the purposes of getting it set up, we could have LLRnet work on the sieve files for the 3 k's that are already sieved, at first?

Cool.

It's a little hard to say. I have 2 cores on it now and will add a 3rd tomorrow but I haven't calculated optimum sieve depth.

A big SWAG would be by this weekend.

Gary

mdettweiler · 2008-01-23, 23:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

Cool.

It's a little hard to say. I have 2 cores on it now and will add a 3rd tomorrow but I haven't calculated optimum sieve depth.

A big SWAG would be by this weekend.

Gary

SWAG???

As for optimal depth...I sieved the k's that I worked on up to p=600G for the n=30K-100K range, and they seemed to be sieved pretty well.

gd_barnes · 2008-01-23, 23:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous

SWAG???

As for optimal depth...I sieved the k's that I worked on up to p=600G for the n=30K-100K range, and they seemed to be sieved pretty well.

That's close to my SWAG also; maybe a little higher because of all of the k's thare are more k's.

SWAG = Super Wild A__ Guess. It's what us mainframe legacy programmers have to give the powers that be before we start on an analysis/coding/testing effort. I'm sure it applies to just about all programmers and many other professions also.

Gary

mdettweiler · 2008-01-23, 23:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

That's close to my SWAG also; maybe a little higher because of all of the k's thare are more k's.

SWAG = Super Wild A__ Guess. It's what us mainframe legacy programmers have to give the powers that be before we start on an analysis/coding/testing effort. I'm sure it applies to just about all programmers and many other professions also.

Gary

Ah, I see now.

mdettweiler · 2008-01-24, 01:01

We've decided not to do a third LLRnet server after all--two is enough for a small project such as this, as well as enough work for Carlos.

So, we won't do a Sierp. Base 6 LLRnet server unless we decide to switch over one of the other two servers sometime in the future.

2008-01-22, 03:31	#1
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 3³·5·7·11 Posts	Opinions on team drive #3 I would like to start a team drive for a base that is not a multiple of 2. Can people give me their opinions on which one would be good? I personally like Sierp base 6 right now. Not too many k's remaining (56), not too few, base isn't terribly high, etc. We'd probably put about 48-50 k's in the team drive. When we agree on a good base, I'll start and/or coordinate some sieving on it. Thanks, Gary

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Team drive #14: k=600-1001 n=1M-2M	mdettweiler	No Prime Left Behind	10	2021-03-13 22:32
Team drive #13: k=400-600 n=1M-2M	mdettweiler	No Prime Left Behind	34	2017-08-28 01:04
Team drive #6 k=600-800 n=600K-1M	gd_barnes	No Prime Left Behind	89	2011-03-10 12:34
Opinions wanted on direction of drive 3	gd_barnes	No Prime Left Behind	26	2008-03-07 05:40
Don't Miss The First RPS Team Drive!	Kosmaj	Riesel Prime Search	451	2007-07-08 21:06

2008-01-22, 04:35	#2
mdettweiler A Sunny Moo Aug 2007 USA (GMT-5) 14151₈ Posts	I agree! Sierp. Base 6 looks excellent for the next team drive. It PRP's at a decent speed because it's such a relatively low base, so it's one of the more attractive non-power-of-2 bases.

2008-01-23, 21:15	#3
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 10100010011011₂ Posts	We are going to start a drive #3 for Sierp base 6 when I'm done sieving n=30K-100K for all k's except those already sieved. I started sieving yesterday. We will include all k's except about 8-10 of them for individual reservations. I'll post separate sieved files on those. Gary

2008-01-24, 01:01	#9
mdettweiler A Sunny Moo Aug 2007 USA (GMT-5) 1869₁₆ Posts	We've decided not to do a third LLRnet server after all--two is enough for a small project such as this, as well as enough work for Carlos. So, we won't do a Sierp. Base 6 LLRnet server unless we decide to switch over one of the other two servers sometime in the future.