CRUS LLRnet server discussion - Page 4

mdettweiler · 2008-01-22, 00:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by kar_bon

oh, don't know where i got this verison from. got it for a long time in my tools-directory.

"CHANGELOG.txt" is 0 byte and
"README.txt" contains only

Code:

/*
 * LLRNet - network part of LLR
 *
 * (C) 2004-2005 Vincent Penne
 *
 * Released under GNU LIBRARY GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
 * (See file LICENSE that must be included with this software)
 *
 */

Okay, then it's probably stock.

Until I get the go-ahead from Carlos to post the "official" thread, here's the links to download LLRnet preconfigured for CRUS:

Windows (stock version, power-of-2 bases only)
Linux (stock version, power-of-2 bases only)
FreeBSD (stock version, power-of-2 bases only)
Windows (SR5 version, works for all bases but no GUI)
Linux (SR5 version, works for all bases but no GUI)

mdettweiler · 2008-01-22, 00:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by kar_bon

Code:

7673*2^350008-1 is not prime.  Res64: C08D833F7805E23C  Time : 436.552 sec.
Result 7673/350008 succesfully sent to the server.
19413*2^350008-1 is not prime.  Res64: 6101CA035673057D  Time : 431.894 sec.
Result 19413/350008 succesfully sent to the server.
19413*2^350056-1 is not prime.  Res64: 91C3AFE92586DF45  Time : 451.384 sec.
Result 19413/350056 succesfully sent to the server.

shall i running this over night?

No, seems to be fine.

The stock version is fine for power-of-2 bases.

Oh yeah, duh--I should have realized from the start you were using the stock version. You had a GUI, so you would have to be using the stock LLRnet (the SR5 version doesn't have a GUI).

kar_bon · 2008-01-22, 00:29

ok, than sleep well all.

works fine! great!

karsten

gd_barnes · 2008-01-22, 02:37

HOLY COW!!

While the cat's away, the mice will play!

Nice work guys! 35 posts in < 2 hours. I'll leave this all up to you computer techies and be the audience.

One thing...it bothers me a bit that we must use LLR 3.5.0. Besides having to convert base 16 to base 2, will it work for bases that are not powers of 2? Also, are there any known LLR bugs that were fixed between 3.5.0 and the current version?

Thanks,
Gary

mdettweiler · 2008-01-22, 04:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

HOLY COW!!

While the cat's away, the mice will play!

Nice work guys! 35 posts in < 2 hours. I'll leave this all up to you computer techies and be the audience.

One thing...it bothers me a bit that we must use LLR 3.5.0. Besides having to convert base 16 to base 2, will it work for bases that are not powers of 2? Also, are there any known LLR bugs that were fixed between 3.5.0 and the current version?

Thanks,
Gary

The only detriments to using LLR 3.5 are that it doesn't automatically convert power-of-2 bases to base 2 (that was added in 3.6), and that there were some small speed improvements (though as far as I know they only affected LLR tests, i.e. only base 2 Riesel numbers) added in 3.6. As for working with bases that are not powers of 2, the LLRNet server software works with any base without modification; and on the client side, whereas the stock LLRnet client doesn't work with non-base 2 numbers, the SR5 project has developed a modified version that works with all bases.

Oh, and by the way: Carlos, after you've upgraded your power supply and are all set for me to "officially" open up the LLRnet server to the general public, I'll be sending you some more files. They'll be Riesel Base 16, just like the ones you've got now, so you can just add the numbers to the end of the current file.

Gary, you might want to get the sieving rolling for Riesel Base 16 n>100K, because the LLRnet server might eat up what's currently left of the 2nd Drive pretty fast!

mdettweiler · 2008-01-22, 05:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous

Quote:

Originally Posted by kar_bon

Code:

     7673*2^350008-1 is not prime.  Res64: C08D833F7805E23C  Time : 436.552 sec.
Result 7673/350008 succesfully sent to the server.
19413*2^350008-1 is not prime.  Res64: 6101CA035673057D  Time : 431.894 sec.
Result 19413/350008 succesfully sent to the server.
19413*2^350056-1 is not prime.  Res64: 91C3AFE92586DF45  Time : 451.384 sec.
Result 19413/350056 succesfully sent to the server.

shall i running this over night?

No, seems to be fine.

The stock version is fine for power-of-2 bases.

Oh yeah, duh--I should have realized from the start you were using the stock version. You had a GUI, so you would have to be using the stock LLRnet (the SR5 version doesn't have a GUI).

Oops, I think I worded that wrong.

I meant that everything was all right, and that you'd be clear to run it all night if you wanted to. Sorry if you interpreted it as "don't run it overnight"!

Anon

P.S.: Actually, I would be really glad if you could run it overnight--I'd like to get these Riesel Base 16 candidates finished up so we can insert some Sierpinski Base 16 work, where help is more needed (the server must be run dry before a different type of candidates can be inserted).

kar_bon · 2008-01-22, 09:07

ok, running again (16 tests done)

em99010pepe · 2008-01-22, 09:15

After drying the server I'll double-check myself the numbers...

Members running the LLRnet client: kar_bon and Anonymous.

em99010pepe · 2008-01-22, 12:19

Anon,

Your LLRNet RS5 version link is broken...

Carlos

em99010pepe · 2008-01-22, 13:05

Is is possible to clean this thread and leave only what's necessary to set up the LLRnet server?

gd_barnes · 2008-01-22, 16:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

Is is possible to clean this thread and leave only what's necessary to set up the LLRnet server?

I can do that. Let me know which post #'s you want to keep or which ones you want to delete and I'll take care of it.

2008-01-22, 09:15	#41
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2830₁₀ Posts	After drying the server I'll double-check myself the numbers... Members running the LLRnet client: kar_bon and Anonymous. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-01-22 at 16:45 Reason: Corrected wording as requested

2008-01-22, 12:19	#42
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2·5·283 Posts	Anon, Your LLRNet RS5 version link is broken... Carlos Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2008-01-22 at 12:20

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
discontinuation of the LLRNet server	opyrt	Prime Sierpinski Project	1	2009-09-07 19:13
LLRnet servers for CRUS	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	39	2008-07-15 10:26
NPLB LLRnet server discussion	em99010pepe	No Prime Left Behind	229	2008-04-30 19:13
New LLRnet servers discussion	IronBits	Conjectures 'R Us	11	2008-03-20 03:43
llrnet server down?	Molnar	Prime Sierpinski Project	4	2006-10-19 14:32

2008-01-22, 00:29	#36
kar_bon Mar 2006 Germany 5533₈ Posts	ok, than sleep well all. works fine! great! karsten

2008-01-22, 02:37	#37
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 28A3₁₆ Posts	HOLY COW!! While the cat's away, the mice will play! Nice work guys! 35 posts in < 2 hours. I'll leave this all up to you computer techies and be the audience. One thing...it bothers me a bit that we must use LLR 3.5.0. Besides having to convert base 16 to base 2, will it work for bases that are not powers of 2? Also, are there any known LLR bugs that were fixed between 3.5.0 and the current version? Thanks, Gary

2008-01-22, 09:07	#40
kar_bon Mar 2006 Germany 3²×17×19 Posts	ok, running again (16 tests done)

2008-01-22, 13:05	#43
em99010pepe Sep 2004 B0E₁₆ Posts	Is is possible to clean this thread and leave only what's necessary to set up the LLRnet server?