mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Conjectures 'R Us

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2008-01-05, 19:39   #23
tnerual
 
tnerual's Avatar
 
Oct 2006

7·37 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn1 View Post
Well, there has been a slight speed improvement after 3.5; nothing earth-shattering, about 5-7% (for base-2 as well as non-base-2).
finally i'm still using the llrnet but with a work around ...

i took the knpairs, multiplied the exponent by 4 and changed the base to 2 ..
tests are going 4 times faster !
tnerual is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-01-05, 21:58   #24
geoff
 
geoff's Avatar
 
Mar 2003
New Zealand

13×89 Posts
Default

58582*16^40601+1 is prime!
geoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-01-05, 22:17   #25
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3·2,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn1 View Post
Well, there has been a slight speed improvement after 3.5; nothing earth-shattering, about 5-7% (for base-2 as well as non-base-2).
Oh, I forgot! According to LLR's changelog, the feature that automatically converts power-of-2 bases to base 2 was added 3.5.1! At least you can work around it by converting the sieve file to base 2. Though it would be nice if a new LLRNet based on the newer LLR could be released.
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-01-06, 00:28   #26
kar_bon
 
kar_bon's Avatar
 
Mar 2006
Germany

B5B16 Posts
Default

49860*16^50809+1 is prime! (61185 digits)
kar_bon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-01-06, 01:17   #27
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

101×103 Posts
Default

Great prime finding day! 5 total so far.

On primes found in higher ranges than what others are searching at the moment, (i.e. the n=50809 prime where others are searching n<50K) if people don't mind leaving the k in their lower search-ranges, I would REALLY appreciate it. I'd like to think that we found the lowest prime possible for each k and it will also correlate with my top-10 lowest k-value primes list for each k on the web pages. Just me being my anal retentive self. It shouldn't make much difference at this low n-value. Of course they can be removed at your discretion from any n-range that is higher.

I'm currently in the slow process of putting together a list of primes for all k's for both sides of all bases that have been searched so far. We'll need it for historical record as the conjectures are proven or nearly proven.

It'll be later tonight (CST US) before I can get the k's removed from the higher n-ranges for the 2 primes found here. If you reserve one, as usual, you can use srfile to remove k=49860 and 58582 from them.


Thanks,
Gary

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-01-06 at 01:18
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-01-06, 06:00   #28
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3×2,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
Great prime finding day! 5 total so far.

On primes found in higher ranges than what others are searching at the moment, (i.e. the n=50809 prime where others are searching n<50K) if people don't mind leaving the k in their lower search-ranges, I would REALLY appreciate it. I'd like to think that we found the lowest prime possible for each k and it will also correlate with my top-10 lowest k-value primes list for each k on the web pages. Just me being my anal retentive self. It shouldn't make much difference at this low n-value. Of course they can be removed at your discretion from any n-range that is higher.
Oh, sorry. I removed it before I even got to reading your post--and then promptly deleted the original file. So unfortunately I can't leave it in. However, if you'd like to search the n's remaining in my range for that k, the last n for that k that I tested in my range (47K-50K) was n=47819.

Hope this helps!
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-01-06, 07:47   #29
tnerual
 
tnerual's Avatar
 
Oct 2006

25910 Posts
Default

17970*2^158160+1 is prime! Time : 100.0 sec.

range 35k-40k finished (mix of base 16 and base 2 results in file)

i take 53k-56k
Attached Files
File Type: zip sierp16from35kto40k.zip (84.0 KB, 134 views)

Last fiddled with by tnerual on 2008-01-06 at 07:49
tnerual is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-01-06, 09:06   #30
kar_bon
 
kar_bon's Avatar
 
Mar 2006
Germany

32·17·19 Posts
Default 50k to 53k complete

two primes in this range:
49860*16^50809+1 (mentioned before)
19465*16^51462+1 (new)

taking 56k-58k
Attached Files
File Type: zip sierp16_50k-53k.zip (39.9 KB, 152 views)
kar_bon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-01-06, 09:21   #31
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

101·103 Posts
Default Almost everyone in on the act today!

Quote:
Originally Posted by tnerual View Post
17970*2^158160+1 is prime! Time : 100.0 sec.

range 35k-40k finished (mix of base 16 and base 2 results in file)

i take 53k-56k
Good thinking on converting to base 2. It looks like just about everyone got in on the act today. Great work everyone! 7 total primes by 6 different people in 24 hours. On the team effort; 4 primes by 3 different people.


Quote:
Originally Posted by kar_bon View Post
two primes in this range:
49860*16^50809+1 (mentioned before)
19465*16^51462+1 (new)

taking 56k-58k
Nice work Karsten! With your resources, feel free to take 2 or 3 ranges at a time if you want to. I'll be shortly updating the files to exclude the 4 primes found today for the team effort.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymous View Post
Oh, sorry. I removed it before I even got to reading your post--and then promptly deleted the original file. So unfortunately I can't leave it in. However, if you'd like to search the n's remaining in my range for that k, the last n for that k that I tested in my range (47K-50K) was n=47819.

Hope this helps!
Not a problem. I'm not quite so anal as to worry about such a small range for a single k. Thanks for letting me know.


Gary

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-01-07 at 03:48 Reason: Changed single n to single k
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-01-06, 20:07   #32
kar_bon
 
kar_bon's Avatar
 
Mar 2006
Germany

32×17×19 Posts
Default

range 56k-58k complete, no primes

taking 58k-60k
Attached Files
File Type: zip sierp16_56K-58K.zip (26.7 KB, 134 views)
kar_bon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-01-06, 23:07   #33
geoff
 
geoff's Avatar
 
Mar 2003
New Zealand

48516 Posts
Default

62802*16^42004+1 is prime!
geoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sierp base 6 - team drive #3 gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 373 2014-06-11 21:31
Sierp base 63 - team drive #5 rogue Conjectures 'R Us 146 2011-04-20 05:12
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive II gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 46 2009-10-26 18:19
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive Ib gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 43 2009-03-06 08:41
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive Ia gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 170 2008-11-11 05:10

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:06.


Tue Jul 27 10:06:33 UTC 2021 up 4 days, 4:35, 0 users, load averages: 2.20, 2.02, 1.95

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.