![]() |
|
|
#23 | |
|
Oct 2006
7·37 Posts |
Quote:
i took the knpairs, multiplied the exponent by 4 and changed the base to 2 .. tests are going 4 times faster ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Mar 2003
New Zealand
13×89 Posts |
58582*16^40601+1 is prime!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
B5B16 Posts |
49860*16^50809+1 is prime! (61185 digits)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101×103 Posts |
Great prime finding day! 5 total so far.
On primes found in higher ranges than what others are searching at the moment, (i.e. the n=50809 prime where others are searching n<50K) if people don't mind leaving the k in their lower search-ranges, I would REALLY appreciate it. I'd like to think that we found the lowest prime possible for each k and it will also correlate with my top-10 lowest k-value primes list for each k on the web pages. Just me being my anal retentive self. It shouldn't make much difference at this low n-value. Of course they can be removed at your discretion from any n-range that is higher.I'm currently in the slow process of putting together a list of primes for all k's for both sides of all bases that have been searched so far. We'll need it for historical record as the conjectures are proven or nearly proven. It'll be later tonight (CST US) before I can get the k's removed from the higher n-ranges for the 2 primes found here. If you reserve one, as usual, you can use srfile to remove k=49860 and 58582 from them. Thanks, Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-01-06 at 01:18 |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Quote:
I removed it before I even got to reading your post--and then promptly deleted the original file. So unfortunately I can't leave it in. However, if you'd like to search the n's remaining in my range for that k, the last n for that k that I tested in my range (47K-50K) was n=47819.Hope this helps!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Oct 2006
25910 Posts |
17970*2^158160+1 is prime! Time : 100.0 sec.
range 35k-40k finished (mix of base 16 and base 2 results in file) i take 53k-56k Last fiddled with by tnerual on 2008-01-06 at 07:49 |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
32·17·19 Posts |
two primes in this range:
49860*16^50809+1 (mentioned before) 19465*16^51462+1 (new) taking 56k-58k |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |||
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101·103 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for letting me know.Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-01-07 at 03:48 Reason: Changed single n to single k |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
32×17×19 Posts |
range 56k-58k complete, no primes
taking 58k-60k |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Mar 2003
New Zealand
48516 Posts |
62802*16^42004+1 is prime!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sierp base 6 - team drive #3 | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 373 | 2014-06-11 21:31 |
| Sierp base 63 - team drive #5 | rogue | Conjectures 'R Us | 146 | 2011-04-20 05:12 |
| Sierp base 3 - mini-drive II | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 46 | 2009-10-26 18:19 |
| Sierp base 3 - mini-drive Ib | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 43 | 2009-03-06 08:41 |
| Sierp base 3 - mini-drive Ia | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 170 | 2008-11-11 05:10 |