![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Noodles
"Mr. Tuch"
Dec 2007
Chennai, India
3×419 Posts |
After finishing off 6,305- with
prp53 factor: 24506226188880631899928133376464081634967825718604821 prp103 factor: 106807185570378376118112346126897310429409832236904179083343713921419372 4057795181478916448908089214641 I am currently trying to do so for 7,295-. What parameters do you recommend for it? It has taken 8 months for sieving for 6,305-, far much longer than what others would have taken. I have started up 7,295- with factor base limits of 30 million on the algebraic side and 50 million on the rational polynomial. I have set up with 28 bit large primes for the quartic and 29 bit large primes for the linear polynomial. Is it all OK? I have taken the value for skewness as 1. Mr. Sander Hoogendoorn and Mr. Tom Womack each of them have finished up with 5,447- and 10,309- in just 2 weeks. Even for a quartic, with 2 cores, they would not have taken more than a maximum of 3 months at all. My guess is that all my delay is due to poor parameters only. Even for a quartic, Dr. Silverman have finished off 2,1630M in one month time, with six cores. With two cores, he would not have taken more than three months time. For 6,305-, I needed to sieve all special-q from 10000 to 40 million with factor base limits of 40 million on both sides to get sufficient relations. Assuming that a sieving special-q range of 100000 on each core takes about 18 hours on each core, it takes about 7200 CPU hours to sieve the entire thing. Or it takes about atleast 6 months to do the entire sieving on both the cores. The slowing down of processor due to accumulation of dust in the heat sink wouldn't have caused much difference. It happened near the end of the sieving only. It took 8 months for the sieving, if I was aware of the slowness of the processor due to dust and taken remedy for it, sieving should not have taken up less than 6 months. I have compensated for it up right by running some of the work for the sieving job in my uncle's computer. All of the delay, I believe is only due to poor parameters only. Please give me the optimal parameters, what you think so of, for 7,295-. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
47·229 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Noodles
"Mr. Tuch"
Dec 2007
Chennai, India
3·419 Posts |
Quote:
akruppa and Xyzzy, please co-operate. @ xilman: What made you to change your decision? Once again, thanks for giving me a chance. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2^947+1 status | fivemack | Factoring | 17 | 2014-05-06 18:00 |
| Status | bsquared | Game 2 - ββββββ - Shaolin Pirates | 4 | 2013-10-01 06:18 |
| Status of p-1.... | dave_0273 | Marin's Mersenne-aries | 80 | 2008-01-28 00:18 |
| 3,599+ status and discussion | xilman | Cunningham Tables | 53 | 2007-12-02 16:40 |
| status | wfgarnett3 | PSearch | 3 | 2004-03-02 18:04 |