![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
23×3×112 Posts |
This thread is for all people, who releases their k and got some sieve-files to provide for other searchers.
Below is a table with the currently available sieved files with some data. Please feel free to post your sieves with such data here to avoid double work for next searchers. Code:
k contributor last edit range sieved up # candidates status 251 Flatlander 25.11.2007 805k-5M 16.35T 39046 available 27253 kar_bon 26.11.2007 1M-5M 500B 15263 available 31511 kar_bon 26.11.2007 1M-5M 1.089T 11829 available Last fiddled with by kar_bon on 2007-11-26 at 09:03 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Nov 2003
2×1,811 Posts |
k=97
930k < n < 3M Sieved to about 3T. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33×5×7×11 Posts |
Great idea, Karsten!
I have some old stragglers myself. They do need to be sieved a little further but they would be a good start if someone wants them: k=15015; n=334K-400K; to P=24.6G (2 primes already found by someone else in the low-end of this range but likely another prime or two in there for this high-weight primoral k) k=686701125; n=400K-500K; to P=352.6G (Received from someone else shortly before I included the k in my high-weight k search. I have this k reserved but am only taking it up to n=400K.) k=3; n=33219278-33.3M (!!); to P=200G (10-million digit babies! Not for the faint of heart! There are 5925 candidates that need to be sieved just a 'wee bit' further. )Kosmaj, would it be a good idea to include available k's and ranges for Masser's older sieved files in here? Or have all of those been reserved now? Edit: If anyone wants one of the first two, I'll be glad to sieve them up to the optimal point and then send them to you. But not for k=3! ![]() Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2007-11-26 at 17:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
12FD16 Posts |
Is 1871 tested from 10k to 649k?
-Curtis |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Jul 2007
Tennessee
25·19 Posts |
Hi Curtis. k=1871 is tested to n=724642. I forgot to remove the last bit of work. The factors and LLR Res64s are included in the archive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
23·3·112 Posts |
i tested k=1471 from AES further:
actually LLR-tested at 388k and going further. found prime at n=386575 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
242338 Posts |
Quote:
Karsten, you might want to update the test limit to n=724.6K on k=1871. I see it still shows n=10K on your web page for 300 < n < 2000. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33·5·7·11 Posts |
I have files for k=37, 41, 43, 61, and 63 for n=800K-1000 sieved to P=10T. I'm currently testing them all from n=585K-800K.
I also have a file for k=9 for n=850K-1100K sieved to P=10T. I'm not currently testing it. If no one wants it, I'll do it after I'm done with the above 5 k's to n=800K. Gary |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A frustratingly large number on offer | fivemack | Aliquot Sequences | 7 | 2012-01-14 02:39 |
| Sieved files/sieving coordination | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 32 | 2008-01-22 03:09 |
| An offer... | Primeinator | Lounge | 23 | 2006-09-21 01:26 |
| Sieved? | Zeta-Flux | Cunningham Tables | 5 | 2006-08-28 13:45 |
| It'd probably be best if I just sieved. | jasong | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 3 | 2005-03-14 03:40 |