Which range with which dat (expert discussion) - Page 2

Brucifer · 2007-10-24, 16:34

???? Just saying I will finish my range up to 997000 with the non-combined dat. And just offering Joe help on the 500G range he commented on might needing to look at more closely. I was just in a hurry and made a couple typing mistakes....

VJS · 2007-10-24, 18:13

Interesting on the speed difference, perhaps SR2 is alot different.

In any regards if we get some specific recommendation that certainly superceeds anything, so far everything looks A-OK...

Thanks for your work Bruce.

Brucifer · 2007-10-24, 18:55

I think that this project has shown a lot of effort from a great many people all the way around. We've got some really dedicated ones on the psp effort, and most certainly too on the sob effort. That everyone has jumped together on both projects for the overall benefit of both projects is really something! It was a major help from the sob people to be willing to help the psp effort with the combined sieving! A big change from a few years ago when I first talked with Lars. And while psp still has some catching up to do, it's pretty cool that we are at the point now where we are talking about the issues with the 1200T because we are quickly approaching it.

So all in all, it's all because there's a great group of dedicated people working away in many different capacities on this effort and everyone deserves a big pat on the back cause we wouldn't be here without everyone's participation! A really great group of people!!

jasong · 2007-10-24, 20:23

I haven't ever crunched the PSP, except possibly the numbers that coincide with SOB. But if I'm not mistaken, you guys are at about n=3-4M. Unless people specifically prefer sieving for whatever reason, I think PRP or LLR should be the preferred part of the project for a good long while.

Just my opinion.

Joe O · 2007-10-28, 21:54

Bruce,
Doing it with the combined dat would be a waste of time. Do you really want to juggle 3 dat files? If so, email me or pm me and I will send you the SoB only dat and the range. If not I understand.
Thanks,
Joe

Brucifer · 2007-10-29, 00:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe O

Doing it with the combined dat would be a waste of time.

I'll just finish this range with the non-combined, and then switch to combined for work after this one.

Joe O · 2007-10-29, 01:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brucifer

I'll just finish this range with the non-combined, and then switch to combined for work after this one.

800000-810000 is a very rich range that should have a lot of SoB factors.

1011500-1012600
1037500-1038000
and
1060500-1062000

Would help me calibrate my gap program. I think that only 1037500-1038000 will actually have SoB factors. See attached graph.

Brucifer · 2007-10-29, 03:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe O

800000-810000 is a very rich range that should have a lot of SoB factors.

1011500-1012600
1037500-1038000
and
1060500-1062000

Would help me calibrate my gap program. I think that only 1037500-1038000 will actually have SoB factors. See attached graph.

No problem in running them, what do you want them run with, combined or sob only? If sob only then I need the .dat. And I'll just switch over and knock those out then before I finish the present reservation.

edit: I'm just starting them with the combined dat and will run them with that. :) Do I need to put these on the reservation page to reserve them... I guess I will, and if they don't need to be then someone can just remove them. :)

Bruce

Joe O · 2007-10-29, 08:26

You seem to have correctly interpreted my cryptic post.
Since you had indicated that you were interested in combined dat work, I thought that I would post the most critical ranges. Thanks.

2007-10-24, 18:55	#14
Brucifer Dec 2005 313 Posts	I think that this project has shown a lot of effort from a great many people all the way around. We've got some really dedicated ones on the psp effort, and most certainly too on the sob effort. That everyone has jumped together on both projects for the overall benefit of both projects is really something! It was a major help from the sob people to be willing to help the psp effort with the combined sieving! A big change from a few years ago when I first talked with Lars. And while psp still has some catching up to do, it's pretty cool that we are at the point now where we are talking about the issues with the 1200T because we are quickly approaching it. So all in all, it's all because there's a great group of dedicated people working away in many different capacities on this effort and everyone deserves a big pat on the back cause we wouldn't be here without everyone's participation! A really great group of people!! Last fiddled with by Brucifer on 2007-10-24 at 18:57

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Any TI/AM35x/Sitara/WinCE6 expert around?	LaurV	Lounge	0	2012-12-27 10:00
OK, how can we get a range now?	thechickenman	Lone Mersenne Hunters	4	2008-12-01 10:45
please help me, cal expert	tinhnho	Homework Help	11	2007-09-25 12:24
Available range for TF to 2^60?	edorajh	Lone Mersenne Hunters	2	2003-12-31 16:04
NOVICE INSTRUCTIONS & EXPERT	TTn	15k Search	0	2003-06-05 19:13

2007-10-24, 16:34	#12
Brucifer Dec 2005 313 Posts	???? Just saying I will finish my range up to 997000 with the non-combined dat. And just offering Joe help on the 500G range he commented on might needing to look at more closely. I was just in a hurry and made a couple typing mistakes....

2007-10-24, 18:13	#13
VJS Dec 2004 13×23 Posts	Interesting on the speed difference, perhaps SR2 is alot different. In any regards if we get some specific recommendation that certainly superceeds anything, so far everything looks A-OK... Thanks for your work Bruce.

2007-10-24, 20:23	#15
jasong "Jason Goatcher" Mar 2005 3·7·167 Posts	I haven't ever crunched the PSP, except possibly the numbers that coincide with SOB. But if I'm not mistaken, you guys are at about n=3-4M. Unless people specifically prefer sieving for whatever reason, I think PRP or LLR should be the preferred part of the project for a good long while. Just my opinion.

2007-10-28, 21:54	#16
Joe O Aug 2002 3×5²×7 Posts	Bruce, Doing it with the combined dat would be a waste of time. Do you really want to juggle 3 dat files? If so, email me or pm me and I will send you the SoB only dat and the range. If not I understand. Thanks, Joe

2007-10-29, 08:26	#20
Joe O Aug 2002 20D₁₆ Posts	You seem to have correctly interpreted my cryptic post. Since you had indicated that you were interested in combined dat work, I thought that I would post the most critical ranges. Thanks.