sr5sieve Benchmark thread - Page 3

Xentar · 2007-10-12, 06:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogue

12200-12300 done. It took about two days using both cores on a Core 2 Duo

Which core 2 duo?
A few months ago, I needed about 1 week for 2x50G on my E6600

rogue · 2007-10-12, 11:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xentar

Which core 2 duo?
A few months ago, I needed about 1 week for 2x50G on my E6600

The speed is 2.4 Ghz. As for the model, I don't know and I don't know how to determine it either.

We might also be comparing apples to oranges. I am running the latest version of sr5sieve with ARCH=x86-64. Do you know which version you were running and what ARCH it was built with?

Xentar · 2007-10-12, 14:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogue

The speed is 2.4 Ghz. As for the model, I don't know and I don't know how to determine it either.

We might also be comparing apples to oranges. I am running the latest version of sr5sieve with ARCH=x86-64. Do you know which version you were running and what ARCH it was built with?

Yeah, 2.4 GHz should be E66**
I was running Win-x86, with, I think sr5sieve 1.5.17, so it is a little bit older.

em99010pepe · 2010-05-28, 23:57

Core i5 750 @3.7 GHz, sr5sieve 1.8.10, 64-bit version, sr5data.txt with 209 k's

980 kp/sec/core

2010-05-28, 23:57	#26
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2×5×283 Posts	Core i5 750 @3.7 GHz, sr5sieve 1.8.10, 64-bit version, sr5data.txt with 209 k's 980 kp/sec/core Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2010-05-28 at 23:57

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Perpetual benchmark thread...	Xyzzy	Hardware	849	2021-05-20 12:38
Hardware Benchmark Jest Thread for 100M exponents	joblack	Hardware	284	2020-12-29 03:54
Sieve Benchmark Thread	Historian	Twin Prime Search	105	2013-02-05 01:35
LLR benchmark thread	Oddball	Riesel Prime Search	5	2010-08-02 00:11
Could something be wrong with Linux sr5sieve?	jasong	Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5	3	2007-03-12 03:13