![]() |
|
|
#397 |
|
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
175810 Posts |
Maybe I'm just not very sharp today, but I didn't see an explanation for the slowdown in the last few posts.
Last fiddled with by jinydu on 2007-05-25 at 03:28 |
|
|
|
|
|
#398 | |
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22·3·641 Posts |
Quote:
.20950553 * 4880000 = 1022387 (to the nearest integer) .20950553 * 332192831 = 69596235 (to the nearest integer) Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2007-05-25 at 04:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#399 |
|
Oct 2002
France
2·5·13 Posts |
Hi Yxine
<StatAddict> It has been a long time since the last MasterPrime.xls (10/04/2007) Do you have time to post a new one? </StatAddict> Thanks a lot. Ludo |
|
|
|
|
|
#400 |
|
Jan 2006
Tampa, Florida
2×97 Posts |
I've updated my website www.StarQwest.org regarding the P-1 factoring anomaly and with further info on the testing of this number. Check out the Team StarQwest page of my site if you're interested. I'll keep you posted on this test. The current expected completion of P-1 and start of LL is September 15th, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#401 |
|
Jan 2006
Tampa, Florida
3028 Posts |
P-1 factoring is now 65% complete. It will finish around September 29th, 2007, and if no factor is found, I will begin the LL test. I will keep updating www.StarQwest.org every time a new milestone is reached.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#402 |
|
Jan 2006
Tampa, Florida
2·97 Posts |
P-1 factoring is complete! No factor was found, so I began the LL test. I am currently at iteration 7500. It takes about 0.950 seconds per iteration, so I should complete about 90,000 per day. Check out www.StarQwest.org, as I have updated it with the new information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#403 |
|
Jun 2003
22218 Posts |
There may be a case for waiting until v 25 is stable, since it can devote multiple cores to a single LL test. (Even if you don't have a dual or multi core processor now, you will probably get one in due course.)
It would be a shame to start now with version 24 only to discover that the stable 25 can't read the save file. Even worse would be to start with 25 only to discover that a bug means that all your effort has been wasted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#404 |
|
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2×3×293 Posts |
Personally, if I only had one dual core machine, I would not devote both cores to testing such a huge exponent because it would cause my stats to stagnate for years and my rankings to fall.
Then again, it's your decision. |
|
|
|
|
|
#405 | |
|
Jan 2006
Tampa, Florida
2·97 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#406 |
|
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2·3·293 Posts |
Go to the software forum and look for threads with version 25 in the title. But be warned that all version 25's are still in the testing phase. Version 24 is still probably the version of choice unless you like testing new software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#407 | |
|
Jan 2008
2·32·5 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| k*2^n-1 primes in 2006 | Kosmaj | Riesel Prime Search | 2 | 2007-01-02 04:31 |
| Supercomputing 2006 | ixfd64 | Lounge | 1 | 2006-11-30 23:34 |
| 2006 | R. Gerbicz | Puzzles | 45 | 2006-09-19 19:32 |
| 2006 Millennium Tech. Prize. | mfgoode | Science & Technology | 0 | 2006-06-17 16:44 |
| March Madness 2006 | Prime95 | Lounge | 20 | 2006-03-21 04:35 |