![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
Apr 2007
448 Posts |
rogue: When I have some more spare time I will look into the process of setting up an ECMNet Server, if this will result in more contributions than it is definitely worth the time. Thanks for the tip!
jasong: No problem! If your only real trouble is compiling ecm than it shouldn't be that difficult. PM me if you run Linux and I can probably help you out, unfortunately I know nothing about Windows. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Aug 2004
New Zealand
223 Posts |
Quote:
Also, note the notation 76#+1 as used at WIFC is nonstandard. I believe it is more usual to write p#+1 where p is the largest prime in the product. For this reason I tend to add a "P" to the front when using the WIFC style of notation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Apr 2007
448 Posts |
Quote:
I ran the following curves: 5688 curves with B1=11e6 on P84# - 1 4084 curves with B1=11e6 on P86# - 1 2790 curves with B1=11e6 on P89# - 1 2500 curves with B1=3e6 on P103# - 1 2500 curves with B1=3e6 on P104# - 1 2500 curves with B1=3e6 on P114# - 1 2500 curves with B1=3e6 on P118# - 1 2500 curves with B1=3e6 on P119# - 1 After checking all the remaining composites I found two errors: the c269 of P133# + 1 and c298 of P134# + 1 turned out to be prime. So two less composites for the primorials + 1 table! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
11001000101102 Posts |
May I reserve 109#+1 (the C143); it ought to take a couple of weeks by GNFS on four cores. I'll also run 110#+1 with ECM 11M on another dual-core for a week or so, which ought to get to t45.
Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2007-08-14 at 10:08 |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Apr 2007
22·32 Posts |
Great! I updated the tables to indicate you run GNFS on this number. I will mainly concentrate on the larger P# - 1 numbers to finish all the remaining 2500 curves with B1=3e6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2·132·19 Posts |
5000 curves at B1=11M on P110 (~140 hours, idle time of a dual-core system); no factor found
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Apr 2007
22·32 Posts |
Quote:
I found four more factors including two for P157# - 1 which finishes this number. P139# - 1 (c315) = p36 * c279 With p36 = 340880743122446342921525125913540909 P141# - 1 (c293) = p41 * c253 With p41 = 10156928967008289071331709863959789982611 P157# - 1 : c380 = p36 * p40 * p305 With p36 = 997030379084688575361184144236643271 and p40 = 1677036798638480081836623887018471486963 Done 1020 curves on P96# - 1 with B1=11e6 Done 1020 curves on P103# - 1 with B1=11e6 Done 2900 curves on P120# - 1 with B1=3e6 Done 2900 curves on P121# - 1 with B1=3e6 Done 2900 curves on P122# - 1 with B1=3e6 Done 2900 curves on P123# - 1 with B1=3e6 Done 2900 curves on P139# - 1 with B1=3e6 Done 2900 curves on P140# - 1 with B1=3e6 Done 2900 curves on P141# - 1 with B1=3e6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2·132·19 Posts |
Running 2400 curves @ 3e6 on P160+, should take ~36 hours, then will proceed to P159+ and so on.
For the P109+ 143-digit GNFS, I've found a decent polynomial and good sieving parameters, I find about seven relations per second per CPU and need forty million. I'll leave two CPUs running while I'm on vacation in mid-September, but probably won't have factors until the start of October - I'm doing two quite large GNFS jobs at once, have only four CPUs to use, and think it would be unkind to spend my lodger's rent checks on quad-core boxes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
191616 Posts |
2400 @ 3e6 on P160+; no factor
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Apr 2007
1001002 Posts |
Done 2520 curves on P111# - 1 with B1=3e6
Done 2900 curves on P112# - 1 with B1=3e6 Done 2500 curves on P126# - 1 with B1=3e6 Found a 38-digit factor which finishes the factorization of P142# - 1 P142# - 1 (c295) = p38 * p258 With p38 = 18303018932796265837451137127995991537 And a new one for P154# - 1: P154# - 1 (c370) = p32 * c339 With p32 = 10863458068568643283688118471511 Tables have been updated. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
635210 Posts |
Have you done any P-1 or P+1 factoring on these numbers?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Primorials squared primes? | siegert81 | Math | 6 | 2010-12-28 15:17 |
| Factorization of 7,254+ | dleclair | NFSNET Discussion | 1 | 2006-03-21 05:11 |
| Factorization of 11,212+ | Wacky | NFSNET Discussion | 1 | 2006-03-20 23:43 |
| Factorization of 5,307- | Jeff Gilchrist | NFSNET Discussion | 7 | 2005-02-23 19:46 |
| Factors of primorials | grandpascorpion | Math | 9 | 2005-02-10 07:13 |