![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Apr 2005
DFW, tx
3·11 Posts |
Hey Folks,
I've used prime95 off and on for about six years and think its going to be my distributed computing program of choice from now on. Anyway, I like to keep my prime95 window uncluttered so I have it report its progress in iterations of 3 million. This is good since I leave my computer on 24/7 but sucks because the closer I get to 100% the more anticipation I have of it possibly being prime. So, I'd like to see a feature added where not only can it be specified how many iterations to wait to update the program/log files but to put the iterations and % complete in the title bar which can have their own rules of how often to update. that way I can more accurately check the progress and not have everything look too messy. Thats all I got, thanks for hearing me out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
Quote:
For more info on LL test: http://www.mersenne.org/math.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucas%E...rsenne_numbers http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Lucas-LehmerTest.html I get anticipation too when my computer gets close to finishing one, but from the way you said it I think you misunderstood what the LL test does. As for your actual suggestion, I think it's a good idea, and I don't know of any way to do it currently. Maybe it could just work that each time 0.01% of it is done (or however much is the least shown...possibly with this amount being adjustable), it would automatically update the % and iterations in the title bar. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Jul 2004
Mid Calder, Scotland
5·37 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
7,537 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17×251 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Apr 2005
DFW, tx
3×11 Posts |
Hey Folks. Thanks for your kind words Mr. Prime95.
Yes, I know that the % complete has absolutely no correlation to the probability of being prime. Bundu interpreted my post correctly. Mini-Geek, just to clarify, my request is in reference to the primality test phase of the process, which takes the longest. In my case I have the program update the log every 3,000,000 iterations and that takes about 2.5 days on my rig. (AMD 64 X2 6000+ 2GB DDR2 800 ram.) I think it would be cool to have options for the title bar to update independently of the log with settings for 'update every xx.xxxx% iterations' & 'update every xxxxxxxx iterations.' And yes, The closer I get to 100% the more anticipation I have of getting a prime. ;-)) Last fiddled with by rainchill on 2007-08-15 at 03:53 Reason: Added more info. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Feb 2005
The Netherlands
21810 Posts |
Another 'simple request': adding a time stamp to every line that's written to the console instead of only adding time stamps to lines that indicate progress. Currently, lines about communication with the server don't have time stamps, and I think it looks neater if they do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
"Mike"
Aug 2002
22×29×71 Posts |
Regarding Windows Prime95:
In the past we've asked for a plain text log file that duplicates the screen output. Once we have the data in a plain text log file the options for what we can do with the data are nearly unlimited. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Dec 2002
32F16 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Simple Question | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 3 | 2012-11-26 02:55 |
| a few simple requests for v5 | ixfd64 | PrimeNet | 44 | 2010-01-11 20:21 |
| A simple question | Bundu | Math | 11 | 2007-09-24 00:02 |
| Simple question... or is it? | akruppa | Puzzles | 28 | 2006-02-04 03:40 |
| A very simple mistake... | Vijay | Programming | 6 | 2005-04-09 11:39 |