mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2003-09-03, 20:10   #1
only_human
 
only_human's Avatar
 
"Gang aft agley"
Sep 2002

2×1,877 Posts
Default Error 11 on version 22.6 -- what to do?

Today upon communicating with the PrimeNet server, I got "Error 11: Exponent already tested."
Strangely, it seems that my machine is retesting an exponent it already sent in the results for. Currently my machine is 61 percent into LL testing M19653323 again.

I assume that if I let my machine complete the LL test again, it will be used as a double check. I am not sure if that is true (or should be) for the same machine posting the same result twice. Should I just let it run, and how might it have happened?

(system details follow)
I move to version 22.6 on August 3rd right after sending in the results of M20165671. My machine sent results for M19653323 (the first time) on Aug 16th. My expected date to complete LL testing on M19653323 (again) is September 13th.

My worktodo.ini file is unchanged from Aug 3rd:
Test=19653323,66,1
Test=15017411,65,1
Test=20165671,66,1

The only entries in my prime.ini file that might not be typical are:
DaysOfWork=30
DiskWriteTime=1200
SequentialWorkToDo=0

Here is my recent prime.log history:
[Sun Aug 03 20:09:00 2003 - ver 23.5]
Sending text message to server:
UID: only_human/bitcruncher, M20165671 completed P-1, B1=240000, B2=5040000, WZ1: 09859AFC
Sending result to server for exponent 20165671
[Wed Aug 06 04:48:36 2003 - ver 23.6]
Updating computer information on the server
Sending expected completion date for M19653323: Aug 17 2003
Sending expected completion date for M15017411: Sep 01 2003
Sending expected completion date for M20165671: Sep 28 2003
[Sat Aug 16 10:33:50 2003 - ver 23.6]
Sending result to server for exponent 19653323
Sending text message to server:
UID: only_human/bitcruncher, M19653323 is not prime. Res64: 201E1455CC68E395. WZ1: 4428B4E4,7146808,00000000
[Wed Sep 03 11:21:47 2003 - ver 23.6]
Updating computer information on the server
Sending expected completion date for M19653323: Sep 14 2003
ERROR 11: Exponent already tested.
Sending expected completion date for M15017411: Sep 29 2003
Sending expected completion date for M20165671: Oct 26 2003

Appologies offered for the size of this message. I wanted to be complete in case it is early notice of a possible software problem.
only_human is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-09-03, 20:13   #2
nomadicus
 
nomadicus's Avatar
 
Jan 2003
North Carolina

3668 Posts
Default

Make sure *all* your files are writeabe. I had a results.txt file (and others) accidentally set to read-only and LL'd the number 3 times.
nomadicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-09-03, 20:29   #3
only_human
 
only_human's Avatar
 
"Gang aft agley"
Sep 2002

375410 Posts
Default

I just checked. That was a good suggestion...alas every file in my Prime95 directory is writeable.
only_human is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-09-03, 20:58   #4
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

35·31 Posts
Default

Did system restore overwrite worktodo.ini with an older version?
Prime95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-09-03, 22:19   #5
only_human
 
only_human's Avatar
 
"Gang aft agley"
Sep 2002

EAA16 Posts
Default

I feel you must be right. I enabled system restore on my machine 8/15/03. At 10:06 p.m. on 8/16/03, I actually used it. I was messing around with all my network software in the wake of concerns about the latest virus flavor and wanted an easy fallback.

My results.txt file was updated at 10:33 a.m. on 8/16/03.
It seems only natural that the worktodo.ini file would be updated at the same time. However my current worktodo.ini file was last modified on 8/03/03.

I haven't sleuthed around enough yet to actually confirm that the worktodo.ini file was overwritten with an old one but it must be so.

Such a straightforward explanation and it never even occurred to me. Thank you for your attention.
only_human is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-09-14, 21:42   #6
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

5×11×47 Posts
Default

The continuation of this thread has now been moved to the new Data forum.
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Error compiling version 29.1 on Arch Linux graysky Software 5 2017-03-22 18:20
ERROR: cudaGetLastError() returned 30: unknown error garo GPU Computing 10 2013-04-27 19:01
Error 5 causes userid change and error 17 updates for exponents Old man PrimeNet PrimeNet 0 2006-02-05 02:27
Prime95 Version 24.13 Error Writing Files RMAC9.5 Software 2 2005-12-05 08:20
ERROR: Primenet error 2252. Q: which tcp/ip ports are being used for the transfer? nevillednz PrimeNet 15 2004-05-17 23:08

All times are UTC. The time now is 16:19.


Sun Aug 1 16:19:55 UTC 2021 up 9 days, 10:48, 0 users, load averages: 2.08, 2.04, 1.84

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.