![]() |
|
|
#122 |
|
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
3×7×167 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
|
May 2004
FRANCE
22·5·29 Posts |
Hi,
to-day, k = 23451 is up to n = 1,807,892 base 2, no prime, continuing... and k = 60849 is up to n = 1,700,346 base 2, no prime, continuing... I think than when exponents 2,000,000 reached, it will be time to split the LLR testing work between several users... Regards, Jean |
|
|
|
|
|
#124 |
|
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
3·7·167 Posts |
Hey, tcadigan, are you sieving this file. If so, where are you at?
If I don't get a response by Wednesday night(I'm in -5GMT time zone) I'm going to go ahead and go from 2,000G. |
|
|
|
|
|
#125 | |
|
Sep 2004
UVic
7010 Posts |
Quote:
I agree with Jean that once we reach 2 mil LLR will have to be split up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#126 |
|
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
3·7·167 Posts |
reserving 2,000G-3,000G
|
|
|
|
|
|
#127 |
|
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
3×7×167 Posts |
When this thread was transferred to the Open Projects Forum, I decided to check what was going on since I'd left. That's when I discovered by forgotten reservation.
Since I have no idea what happened to the original file, I'm going to take what I have here, which is only at 5G, and jump in. I'll post where I intend to go up to after I find out the speed of sr2sieve iwth this file. reserving 5-2500(will take about a week on two cores of my quad-core, my 2.4GHz quad-core e6600 sieves at about 2.1M p a second on each core) Edit 2: I've stopped sieving because nothing is being found past 6G which, considering how fast the factors were coming up to that point, probably indicates a bug of some sort. Edit3: And downloading the most recent update doesn't help a bit. I'm going to move on to another project for the time being. Last fiddled with by jasong on 2007-10-03 at 01:19 |
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
May 2004
FRANCE
22·5·29 Posts |
I am continuing to LLR k=23451 and k=60849 up to n=2,000,000 base two :
To-day, k=23451 is up to n=1,877,792 no prime... k=60849 is up to n=1,804,626 no prime... Some precisions about the present "speed" of this desert crossing : k=60849 is tested on a dual core Centrino, and each n requires a little less than 8 hours presently (but there are 2 "simultaneous" tests)... k=23451 is tested on a 2.53 GHz Pentium 4, and each n requires a little less than 6 hours presently... May we know about the prime test progress on k=18534 and k=64494 ? An updated status of this search would be now useful! Best Regards, Jean |
|
|
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Sep 2004
UVic
1068 Posts |
I am still going but progress is slow, I have to keep my computer off much more than before to save power.
k=64494 just finished n=1745162 I'm still running it... -Tyler |
|
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
Jun 2003
2·7·113 Posts |
k=18534 is at 1.5M. I haven't touched it for a while. If anyone wants to work on it, they can. It is slightly faster than the other k's being less than 10,000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#131 | |
|
May 2004
FRANCE
22·5·29 Posts |
Quote:
It starts at n=1,500,606 For now, the time by iteration is 6 Ms The date of the presieved file I am using is 04/02/2007 There are 692 candidates in the file, so, it would be completed before the end of this year, if no prime found... I wish we will have better luck now! Regards, Jean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#132 | |
|
May 2004
FRANCE
22·5·29 Posts |
Quote:
k=18534, n=1674846, no prime... k=23451, n=1901548, no prime... k=60849, n=1836366, no prime... After the last success of SoB, I think we might also make some double checking... Regards, Jean |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5: Post Primes Here | robert44444uk | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 358 | 2008-12-08 16:28 |
| Sierpinski/Riesel Base 10 | rogue | Conjectures 'R Us | 11 | 2007-12-17 05:08 |
| Sierpinski / Riesel - Base 23 | michaf | Conjectures 'R Us | 2 | 2007-12-17 05:04 |
| Sierpinski / Riesel - Base 22 | michaf | Conjectures 'R Us | 49 | 2007-12-17 05:03 |
| Sierpinski Base 5 Reservations | geoff | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 2 | 2006-08-29 18:23 |