![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Sep 2002
38 Posts |
Just curious to find out.
The new primality test postulates that they can get it down to a cubic polynomial and I'm curious if that might beat out the LL-primality test. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
2×53×71 Posts |
O(n^2 log n)
where n is the number of bits in the Mersenne number. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Sep 2002
3 Posts |
You mean the bits of p or 2^p-1?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
2×53×71 Posts |
Bits of 2^p-1. In other words, O(p^2 log p)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Modifying the Lucas Lehmer Primality Test into a fast test of nothing | Trilo | Miscellaneous Math | 25 | 2018-03-11 23:20 |
| New PC test re-test plan? | dh1 | Information & Answers | 8 | 2015-12-11 11:50 |
| Double check LL test faster than first run test | lidocorc | Software | 3 | 2008-12-03 15:12 |
| Will the torture test, test ALL available memory? | swinster | Software | 2 | 2007-12-01 17:54 |
| A primality test for Fermat numbers faster than Pépin's test ? | T.Rex | Math | 0 | 2004-10-26 21:37 |