P-1 stage offered by itself?

E_tron · 2003-09-02, 22:19

I have a colligation of different PCs out here :) . Some are P3s with a monstrous amount of RAM, some are P4s with just enough RAM to run 2000

, and some i am wondering why i even run them :) .

Typically P-1 stages has about a 3% chance of clearing an exponent right

? What if P-1 stage was offered as an assignment for PrimeNet

? In particular i have access to a P3 machine (that is only a file server, not used much

) w/ 3Gb of ram

. I think it usually has a 6% chance of clearing with P-1. If that machine could just do P-1 for PrimeNet, would that would be a better diversification of labor :) ?

Kevin · 2003-09-03, 00:06

This has been brought up a few times. Making P-1 factoring a type of work would require re-writing the code for Primenet, or a complete re-make of Primenet (which I think is still in the works....). I believe this is one of the things which has been definitely put on the "to-do" list for the new server. For now you can most likely just manually ask George to get a large range of exponents that need to be P-1 factored. Or maybe you could help knock off a 79M for some ambitious Gimpster, (looking your way Pagefault, if you haven't gotten it resolved yet).

*Hint, move this to Server forum?

Uncwilly · 2003-09-03, 13:13

What you could do is to reserve a huge lot of first timers. If you have the sequential switch set, the machine would run through the P-1 first. Then you could manually unreserve all the exponents that have gone through P-1 after you report the results in. Then reserve more. The fact that P-1 has been done does get noted.

2003-09-02, 22:19	#1
E_tron Sep 2002 Austin, TX 1061₈ Posts	P-1 stage offered by itself? I have a colligation of different PCs out here :) . Some are P3s with a monstrous amount of RAM, some are P4s with just enough RAM to run 2000 , and some i am wondering why i even run them :) . Typically P-1 stages has about a 3% chance of clearing an exponent right ? What if P-1 stage was offered as an assignment for PrimeNet ? In particular i have access to a P3 machine (that is only a file server, not used much ) w/ 3Gb of ram . I think it usually has a 6% chance of clearing with P-1. If that machine could just do P-1 for PrimeNet, would that would be a better diversification of labor :) ?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
How to use prime95 for stage 1 & GMP-ECM for stage 2	Prime95	Lone Mersenne Hunters	111	2015-06-13 03:18
P-1 stage 2	davieddy	Information & Answers	23	2011-08-20 07:53
Stage 1 with mprime/prime95, stage 2 with GMP-ECM	D. B. Staple	Factoring	2	2007-12-14 00:21
Need help to run stage 1 and stage 2 separately	jasong	GMP-ECM	9	2007-10-25 22:32
Stage 1 and stage 2 tests missing	Matthias C. Noc	PrimeNet	5	2004-08-25 15:42

2003-09-03, 00:06	#2
Kevin Aug 2002 Ann Arbor, MI 110110001₂ Posts	This has been brought up a few times. Making P-1 factoring a type of work would require re-writing the code for Primenet, or a complete re-make of Primenet (which I think is still in the works....). I believe this is one of the things which has been definitely put on the "to-do" list for the new server. For now you can most likely just manually ask George to get a large range of exponents that need to be P-1 factored. Or maybe you could help knock off a 79M for some ambitious Gimpster, (looking your way Pagefault, if you haven't gotten it resolved yet). *Hint, move this to Server forum?

2003-09-03, 13:13	#3
Uncwilly 6809 > 6502 """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 2³×1,223 Posts	What you could do is to reserve a huge lot of first timers. If you have the sequential switch set, the machine would run through the P-1 first. Then you could manually unreserve all the exponents that have gone through P-1 after you report the results in. Then reserve more. The fact that P-1 has been done does get noted.