mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > GMP-ECM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2007-04-28, 09:53   #1
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2×17×73 Posts
Default Maximum B1 for P+1 = 4294967295?

What is the reason why max. B1 for p+1 = 4294967295 ?
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-28, 13:53   #2
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"๐’‰บ๐’ŒŒ๐’‡ท๐’†ท๐’€ญ"
May 2003
Down not across

2·17·347 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi47 View Post
What is the reason why max. B1 for p+1 = 4294967295 ?
32-bit machine. Go figure.


Paul
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-28, 15:35   #3
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2×17×73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
32-bit machine. Go figure.


Paul
2^32. Sorry for asking, I was just surprised to see this limit because with the same version of GMP-ECM (6.1.2) it is possible to do p minus 1 with B1 far bigger than 2^32 on the same machine. (I already did 150e9)
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-29, 13:51   #4
akruppa
 
akruppa's Avatar
 
"Nancy"
Aug 2002
Alexandria

2,467 Posts
Default

The B1 value is stored in a variable of type double, so that would allow for values bigger than 2^32-1. However, the PRAC algorithm we use in P+1 and ECM uses integers.

Alex
akruppa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-29, 15:45   #5
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2·17·73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akruppa View Post
The B1 value is stored in a variable of type double, so that would allow for values bigger than 2^32-1. However, the PRAC algorithm we use in P+1 and ECM uses integers.

Alex
So it is also not possible to run ECM with B1 > M32?

Currently running P+1 on M1061 with B1 = M32, B2 = 1e14 (I guess it is also possible with p+1 to run stage 2 in steps of B2 = 1e13, B2=1e13-2e13, B2=2e13-3e13 etc. - am I right?)
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-29, 17:27   #6
akruppa
 
akruppa's Avatar
 
"Nancy"
Aug 2002
Alexandria

2,467 Posts
Default

Yes, it's possible. I'd recommend against running P-1/P+1/ECM on M1061, though. On one hand, it is almost certainly wasted effort, on the other hand, if it isn't, someone somewhere might scream like a banshee.

Alex
akruppa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-29, 18:15   #7
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2×17×73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akruppa View Post
Yes, it's possible. I'd recommend against running P-1/P+1/ECM on M1061, though. On one hand, it is almost certainly wasted effort, on the other hand, if it isn't, someone somewhere might scream like a banshee.

Alex
OK. What is the next Mersenne number which no known factor and how much ECM/P-1/P+1 has been done on it?
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-04-29, 21:06   #8
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

17·487 Posts
Default

See http://mersenne.org/ecm1.htm for ECM info on small Mersennes. I think they've been P-1'ed to 4 billion.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-05-08, 10:11   #9
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

1001101100102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
See http://mersenne.org/ecm1.htm for ECM info on small Mersennes. I think they've been P-1'ed to 4 billion.
To whom should I report finished ecm curves on these numbers? The linked page does not tell this.
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-05-08, 13:14   #10
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

17×487 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi47 View Post
To whom should I report finished ecm curves on these numbers? The linked page does not tell this.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-05-09, 13:17   #11
Joe O
 
Joe O's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

3·52·7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akruppa View Post
The B1 value is stored in a variable of type double, so that would allow for values bigger than 2^32-1. However, the PRAC algorithm we use in P+1 and ECM uses integers.

Alex
So how about using a 64 bit integer variable to store the B1 value?
Joe O is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Minimize maximum error Joshua2 Homework Help 10 2011-03-15 13:19
Prime95 featured in Maximum PC! ixfd64 Software 10 2010-05-31 15:21
Maximum memory for P-1 in XP 32-bit willmore Software 4 2009-10-14 02:45
Maximum theoretical MPG TimSorbet Lounge 9 2008-07-14 22:45
cpu not staying at maximum while in Stage 2 jasong GMP-ECM 1 2006-12-18 06:36

All times are UTC. The time now is 13:41.


Fri Jul 7 13:41:19 UTC 2023 up 323 days, 11:09, 0 users, load averages: 0.76, 1.00, 1.10

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

โ‰  ยฑ โˆ“ รท ร— ยท โˆ’ โˆš โ€ฐ โŠ— โŠ• โŠ– โŠ˜ โŠ™ โ‰ค โ‰ฅ โ‰ฆ โ‰ง โ‰จ โ‰ฉ โ‰บ โ‰ป โ‰ผ โ‰ฝ โŠ โА โŠ‘ โŠ’ ยฒ ยณ ยฐ
โˆ  โˆŸ ยฐ โ‰… ~ โ€– โŸ‚ โซ›
โ‰ก โ‰œ โ‰ˆ โˆ โˆž โ‰ช โ‰ซ โŒŠโŒ‹ โŒˆโŒ‰ โˆ˜ โˆ โˆ โˆ‘ โˆง โˆจ โˆฉ โˆช โจ€ โŠ• โŠ— ๐–• ๐–– ๐–— โŠฒ โŠณ
โˆ… โˆ– โˆ โ†ฆ โ†ฃ โˆฉ โˆช โІ โŠ‚ โŠ„ โŠŠ โЇ โŠƒ โŠ… โŠ‹ โŠ– โˆˆ โˆ‰ โˆ‹ โˆŒ โ„• โ„ค โ„š โ„ โ„‚ โ„ต โ„ถ โ„ท โ„ธ ๐“Ÿ
ยฌ โˆจ โˆง โŠ• โ†’ โ† โ‡’ โ‡ โ‡” โˆ€ โˆƒ โˆ„ โˆด โˆต โŠค โŠฅ โŠข โŠจ โซค โŠฃ โ€ฆ โ‹ฏ โ‹ฎ โ‹ฐ โ‹ฑ
โˆซ โˆฌ โˆญ โˆฎ โˆฏ โˆฐ โˆ‡ โˆ† ฮด โˆ‚ โ„ฑ โ„’ โ„“
๐›ข๐›ผ ๐›ฃ๐›ฝ ๐›ค๐›พ ๐›ฅ๐›ฟ ๐›ฆ๐œ€๐œ– ๐›ง๐œ ๐›จ๐œ‚ ๐›ฉ๐œƒ๐œ— ๐›ช๐œ„ ๐›ซ๐œ… ๐›ฌ๐œ† ๐›ญ๐œ‡ ๐›ฎ๐œˆ ๐›ฏ๐œ‰ ๐›ฐ๐œŠ ๐›ฑ๐œ‹ ๐›ฒ๐œŒ ๐›ด๐œŽ๐œ ๐›ต๐œ ๐›ถ๐œ ๐›ท๐œ™๐œ‘ ๐›ธ๐œ’ ๐›น๐œ“ ๐›บ๐œ”