Report Results Here - Page 24

brunoparga · 2007-03-31, 19:36

Nah Patrick, leave us some low-level exponents to work on too...

PatrickSchmeer · 2007-04-02, 04:53

M3321933169 has a factor: 127007409700231225049 at 66.783 bits (21 digits)

Found yesterday at 12h31m UT (Pentium 4, Factor5). No further factor up to 67 bits (2^67).

Patrick

PatrickSchmeer · 2007-04-02, 05:24

M3321933007 no factor from 2^60 to 2^69.
M3321933023 no factor from 2^48 to 2^65.
M3321933047 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67.
M3321933053 no factor from 2^48 to 2^66.
M3321933071 no factor from 2^48 to 2^66.
M3321933089 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67.
M3321933113 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67.
M3321933179 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67.
M3321933193 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67.
M3321933233 no factor from 2^60 to 2^69.
M3321933253 no factor from 2^60 to 2^69.
M3321933289 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67.
M3321933313 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67.
M3321933337 no factor from 2^60 to 2^69.
M3321933361 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66.
M3321933367 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66.
M3321933389 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66.
M3321933451 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66.
M3321933541 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67.
M3321933551 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66.
M3321933577 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66.
M3321933613 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67.
M3321933661 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66.
M3321933679 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66.
M3321933893 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66.

Patrick

PatrickSchmeer · 2007-04-02, 11:17

M3321933073 has another factor: 2662657903531692809 at 61.208 bits (19 digits)

Found today at 09h51m UT (Pentium III, Factor4). No further factor up to 64 bits (2^64).

Patrick

ET_ · 2007-04-02, 19:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by brunoparga

Nah Patrick, leave us some low-level exponents to work on too...

Don't worry Bruno... If Patrick keeps on his behaviour, we'll soon release a new bunch of exponents...

Anyway, your claim is accepted. What if no more than half (or one-third) of the batch of new exponents released may be reserved by the same person at once?

Luigi

ET_ · 2007-04-02, 19:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatrickSchmeer

M3321933073 has another factor: 2662657903531692809 at 61.208 bits (19 digits)

Found today at 09h51m UT (Pentium III, Factor4). No further factor up to 64 bits (2^64).

Patrick

Each range is reserved by only one person. Would you mind waiting for the end of your range before posting the factor? This would help bookkeeping...

Thank you.

Luigi

ET_ · 2007-04-02, 21:27

Just out of curiosity: how many PCs do you devote to OBD?

Luigi

brunoparga · 2007-04-05, 18:55

ALL of them

Rde · 2007-04-09, 20:55

M3321933047 and M3321933089 dont have a factor between 2^67 and 2^68.

ET_ · 2007-04-10, 19:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rde

M3321933047 and M3321933089 dont have a factor between 2^67 and 2^68.

Well done, Rde!

Are you still working on 3321929789, 71 to 75 bits?

Luigi

Rde · 2007-04-11, 17:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by ET_

Are you still working on 3321929789, 71 to 75 bits?

Yes I am, from time to time

Dont know when I'll finsih, but I will.

2007-04-02, 04:53	#255
PatrickSchmeer Nov 2006 Saarbruecken, Germany 102₁₀ Posts	M3321933169 is composite M3321933169 has a factor: 127007409700231225049 at 66.783 bits (21 digits) Found yesterday at 12h31m UT (Pentium 4, Factor5). No further factor up to 67 bits (2^67). Patrick

2007-04-02, 11:17	#257
PatrickSchmeer Nov 2006 Saarbruecken, Germany 2×3×17 Posts	Second factor of M3321933073 M3321933073 has another factor: 2662657903531692809 at 61.208 bits (19 digits) Found today at 09h51m UT (Pentium III, Factor4). No further factor up to 64 bits (2^64). Patrick

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
What does * represent on Recent Results report?	petrw1	PrimeNet	5	2018-07-09 21:14
Report for PRP	houding	PrimeNet	15	2018-01-10 19:24
How to report GPU results	dcorbit	Information & Answers	4	2012-08-13 21:53
How to report P-1 results	James Heinrich	Marin's Mersenne-aries	6	2004-05-27 05:47
Bug report	remaker	Software	4	2002-10-17 08:18

2007-03-31, 19:36	#254
brunoparga Feb 2006 Brasília, Brazil 325₈ Posts	Nah Patrick, leave us some low-level exponents to work on too...

2007-04-02, 05:24	#256
PatrickSchmeer Nov 2006 Saarbruecken, Germany 2×3×17 Posts	M3321933007 no factor from 2^60 to 2^69. M3321933023 no factor from 2^48 to 2^65. M3321933047 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67. M3321933053 no factor from 2^48 to 2^66. M3321933071 no factor from 2^48 to 2^66. M3321933089 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67. M3321933113 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67. M3321933179 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67. M3321933193 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67. M3321933233 no factor from 2^60 to 2^69. M3321933253 no factor from 2^60 to 2^69. M3321933289 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67. M3321933313 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67. M3321933337 no factor from 2^60 to 2^69. M3321933361 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66. M3321933367 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66. M3321933389 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66. M3321933451 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66. M3321933541 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67. M3321933551 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66. M3321933577 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66. M3321933613 no factor from 2^60 to 2^67. M3321933661 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66. M3321933679 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66. M3321933893 no factor from 2^60 to 2^66. Patrick

2007-04-02, 21:27	#260
ET_ Banned "Luigi" Aug 2002 Team Italia 11317₈ Posts	Just out of curiosity: how many PCs do you devote to OBD? Luigi

2007-04-05, 18:55	#261
brunoparga Feb 2006 Brasília, Brazil 213₁₀ Posts	ALL of them

2007-04-09, 20:55	#262
Rde Jan 2006 2·3·7 Posts	M3321933047 and M3321933089 dont have a factor between 2^67 and 2^68.