Report Results Here - Page 21

brunoparga · 2007-03-11, 02:36

How come?? You should go and learn from Microsoft!!!

(just kidding. I'll wait for this exponent to end before I install the new version)

ET_ · 2007-03-11, 14:36

M3321928171 has 0 factors in [2^74, 2^75-1].

Taking 3321929971 from 70 to 74 bits

Luigi

ET_ · 2007-03-15, 20:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by ET_

Taking 3321929971 from 70 to 74 bits

Luigi

M3321929971 has 0 factors in [2^70, 2^74-1].

Taking 3321929971 from 74 to 75 bits

Luigi

PatrickSchmeer · 2007-03-17, 10:46

The following Mersenne numbers have no additional (unreported) factors between 2^65 and 2^69:
M3321931831
M3321931849
M3321931859
M3321931897
M3321931927
M3321931957
M3321931981
M3321932063
M3321932149
M3321932189
M3321932249
M3321932353
M3321932377
M3321932407
M3321932423
M3321932473
M3321932479
M3321932591
M3321932597
M3321932701
M3321932759
M3321932839
M3321932851
M3321932891
M3321932893
M3321932897
M3321932953

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

M3321931831 has a factor: 68216119194814370071 (upto 2^64)

This factor has 65.887 bits, so it is likely that Uncwilly tested this exponent up to 2^66 bits. Anyway, I checked it from 2^65 to 2^69.

Patrick

brunoparga · 2007-03-19, 21:36

M3321929563 has no factors from 70 to 72 bits. I'm reserving a new exponent in a couple minutes, when I have factor5 running on my OBD machine.

Cheers

ET_ · 2007-03-20, 21:57

M3321929971 has 0 factors in [2^74, 2^75-1].

Pausing for a while...

Luigi

brunoparga · 2007-03-20, 23:47

Just one comment to make about the x-po taken in 9 days from 70 to 75 bits...

ET_ · 2007-03-20, 23:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by brunoparga

Just one comment to make about the x-po taken in 9 days from 70 to 75 bits...

And I didn't use the full power of my PC, as I had other testing on the way (factplustwo).

Hmmm... Nine other days, and we get 76 bits. Or another one to 75.

Gotta think about it.

Luigi

brunoparga · 2007-03-21, 00:42

I dunno if this is open to democratic debate and voting or if it's subject to the whim of our Noble Leader (that's you, Luigi), but I'd rather follow that level structure we had planned, which would mean reaching 75 with some esponenti before moving to 76.

OTOH, that would leave fewer light exponents for me to work on

Perhaps, in a few weeks/months, we should ask the guy who tested numbers above 3321933000 for the exponents and their bitdepths. Was it Uncwilly? I think so, I just can't remember now.

Cheers,
Bruno

ET_ · 2007-03-21, 20:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by brunoparga

I dunno if this is open to democratic debate and voting or if it's subject to the whim of our Noble Leader (that's you, Luigi), but I'd rather follow that level structure we had planned, which would mean reaching 75 with some esponenti before moving to 76.

OTOH, that would leave fewer light exponents for me to work on

Perhaps, in a few weeks/months, we should ask the guy who tested numbers above 3321933000 for the exponents and their bitdepths. Was it Uncwilly? I think so, I just can't remember now.

Cheers,
Bruno

Uncwilly tested all exponents below 3321999999 I think.

Let's wait for him.

Luigi

brunoparga · 2007-03-21, 20:59

Yeah but, from a status-keeping viewpoint, that many exponents would be extremely hard to manage

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
What does * represent on Recent Results report?	petrw1	PrimeNet	5	2018-07-09 21:14
Report for PRP	houding	PrimeNet	15	2018-01-10 19:24
How to report GPU results	dcorbit	Information & Answers	4	2012-08-13 21:53
How to report P-1 results	James Heinrich	Marin's Mersenne-aries	6	2004-05-27 05:47
Bug report	remaker	Software	4	2002-10-17 08:18

2007-03-11, 02:36	#221
brunoparga Feb 2006 Brasília, Brazil 325₈ Posts	How come?? You should go and learn from Microsoft!!! (just kidding. I'll wait for this exponent to end before I install the new version)

2007-03-11, 14:36	#222
ET_ Banned "Luigi" Aug 2002 Team Italia 3²·5·107 Posts	M3321928171 has 0 factors in [2^74, 2^75-1]. Taking 3321929971 from 70 to 74 bits Luigi

2007-03-19, 21:36	#225
brunoparga Feb 2006 Brasília, Brazil 3·71 Posts	M3321929563 has no factors from 70 to 72 bits. I'm reserving a new exponent in a couple minutes, when I have factor5 running on my OBD machine. Cheers

2007-03-20, 21:57	#226
ET_ Banned "Luigi" Aug 2002 Team Italia 3²·5·107 Posts	M3321929971 has 0 factors in [2^74, 2^75-1]. Pausing for a while... Luigi

2007-03-20, 23:47	#227
brunoparga Feb 2006 Brasília, Brazil 325₈ Posts	Just one comment to make about the x-po taken in 9 days from 70 to 75 bits...

2007-03-21, 00:42	#229
brunoparga Feb 2006 Brasília, Brazil 3×71 Posts	I dunno if this is open to democratic debate and voting or if it's subject to the whim of our Noble Leader (that's you, Luigi), but I'd rather follow that level structure we had planned, which would mean reaching 75 with some esponenti before moving to 76. OTOH, that would leave fewer light exponents for me to work on Perhaps, in a few weeks/months, we should ask the guy who tested numbers above 3321933000 for the exponents and their bitdepths. Was it Uncwilly? I think so, I just can't remember now. Cheers, Bruno

2007-03-21, 20:59	#231
brunoparga Feb 2006 Brasília, Brazil 3×71 Posts	Yeah but, from a status-keeping viewpoint, that many exponents would be extremely hard to manage