![]() |
|
|
#34 | |
|
"Mike"
Aug 2002
22×29×71 Posts |
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonian_number_system |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
13·131 Posts |
Quote:
1, 10, 60, 600 (10*60), 3 600 (60*60), 36 000 (10*60*60)... A symbol for the units, another symbol for ten, another for 60, superposition of the previous two for 600, another for 3 600, superposition of the symbol ten and 3 6000 for 36 000... For instance u representig the unit, t the ten , s the sixty, r the 600, and o the 3 600, p the 36 000 : pppp ooooo rrrrr ss ttttt u would be 36000+36000+36000+36000+3600+3600+3600+3600+3600+600+600+600+600+60+60+10+10+10+10+10+1=164571 The symbols where grouped in paterns to facilitate reading. (source Histoire universelle des chiffres by George Ifrah, editor Seghers 1981) Xyzzy was quicker to answer :-) Last fiddled with by S485122 on 2007-03-08 at 12:15 Reason: saw answer post after saving |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
145128 Posts |
Quote:
to be a sensible limit. BTW was that the royal "we"? David |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
1E0C16 Posts |
No. Xyzzy uses the editorial we (he being head honcho hereabouts), or perhaps a generic third person (See the "Atypical uses of we" section at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We), or pluralis modestiae (rather than pluralis majestatis, the royal we).
OTOH, Xyzzy does have a tendency to do things like inserting false quotations (e.g. "I quote more ... all day!") between one's nym and avatar in the left margin, which seem more imperial than editorial. Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2007-03-08 at 17:25 Reason: (Three guesses as to the reason for this fiddling!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
"Mike"
Aug 2002
22·29·71 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
"Mike"
Aug 2002
22·29·71 Posts |
BTW, for the record, the actions that we take (Xyzzy, and his evil twin Yzzyx) are, for the most part, random, malicious and devoid of meaning.
Some misguided souls have hypothesized that there is a relationship between various psychotropic medications and our behavior but we dismiss that line of thought as a desperate attempt to make something utterly pathetic and unfathomable into something sensible. Sometimes things really stink, no matter how much perfume you put on them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | ||
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22×3×641 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Xyzzy's earlier use of the editorial we has now progressed into the delusional we. That is, his use has progressed; Xyzzy himself is not actually delusional, but seems desirous of presenting that facade. Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2007-03-09 at 03:49 Reason: Open negotiations for access to my user's signature field. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Bronze Medalist
Jan 2004
Mumbai,India
22·33·19 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
145128 Posts |
Quote:
I have revisited it and come up with this solution: Let F be the reflection of B in AC and let G be the reflection of C in AF. AD=DB and AGB is equilateral Let DG intersect AF at H DGF is 50 degrees so AH=AE BDE=FDG=30 David . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
194A16 Posts |
(Myself included)
A picture must be worth at least 50 words ![]() David PS Or the other way round (as the actress said to the bishop) Last fiddled with by davieddy on 2010-06-27 at 05:31 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Simple Question | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 3 | 2012-11-26 02:55 |
| A simple explanation of NFS? | paul0 | Factoring | 5 | 2011-11-02 23:21 |
| a simple request | rainchill | Software | 8 | 2007-08-28 08:46 |
| Simple Arithmetic! | mfgoode | Puzzles | 82 | 2007-05-02 08:13 |
| Simple question... or is it? | akruppa | Puzzles | 28 | 2006-02-04 03:40 |