Thread: N Weights
View Single Post
Old 2010-04-17, 04:45   #3
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

2×52×7×29 Posts
Default

Karsten is correct. All similiary-sized n's will have virtually the same weight over the long run meaning that if you test enough k's, all similiarly sized n's will have about the same # of primes. Although the weights (i.e. candidates remaining after sieving to some fixed depth like P=511) for all n's should be the same in the long run, the actual # of primes would decrease as the n's got higher simply because they are bigger numbers. :-)

In theory, all n's should have primes for all bases -or- k's at some point so there would be no conjectured "Riesel n" or "Sierp n".

Karsten, I could never understand that whole excercise they did over at TPS with finding the first twin for each n-value. It seemed like a waste of time. It's completely random what k-value the first twin occurred at and it should be easy enough to prove that every n must have a twin for some k at some point.


Gary

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-04-17 at 04:46
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote